主观还是客观:诱惑侦查合法性的标准

发布时间：2018-06-23 08:14

本文选题：诱惑侦查 + 合法界限　；参考：《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年05期

【摘要】：诱惑侦查是一把双刃剑,用之不当会陷无辜者于罪。为避免诱惑侦查的负面效果,必须廓清其合法与非法的界限。在美国,关于诱惑侦查合法性的界限,理论上有主观标准与客观标准之争,前者着眼于被告人的可谴责性,后者专注于警察引诱行为的不适当性。事实上,主观标准与客观标准并非一山不能容二虎的关系,而是具有互补性。借鉴美国的理论与实践,我国宜吸收主观标准和客观标准之长,采"并列模式"规制诱惑侦查行为,禁止犯意引诱,严格限制引诱程度和引诱对象,并授予被告人对非法的诱惑侦查作无罪抗辩的权利。
[Abstract]:Temptation detection is a double-edged sword, the improper use of innocent people will be guilty. In order to avoid the negative effects of enticement investigation, it is necessary to clear its legal and illegal boundaries. In the United States, there is a theoretical dispute between subjective criteria and objective criteria on the limits of the legality of enticement investigation. The former focuses on the reprehensibility of the accused, while the latter focuses on the inappropriate nature of the inducement by the police. In fact, subjective and objective criteria are not the relationship between one mountain and two tigers, but are complementary. Drawing lessons from the theory and practice of the United States, our country should absorb the advantages of subjective and objective standards, adopt the "parallel mode" to regulate the behavior of temptation investigation, prohibit the inducement of criminal intent, strictly limit the degree of attraction and the object of attraction. The defendant is also granted the right to plead not guilty to the illegal enticement investigation.
【作者单位】：昆明理工大学法学院;山东省德州市夏津县人民检察院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学西部和边疆地区青年基金项目(12XJC820001) 昆明理工大学引进人才项目(KKSY201224012)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】