行政复议和行政诉讼程序衔接研究

发布时间：2018-06-27 03:07

本文选题：行政复议 + 行政诉讼　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为我们国家行政法领域最重要的两种纠纷解决方式的行政复议和行政诉讼,两者之间存在着许多相似之处,同时也包含着巨大的差异。受到我国现实国情的影响,我国行政复议和行政诉讼的衔接模式包含自由选择型、复议前置型、行政复议终局型、迳行起诉型等四种类型,同时也存在着一系列的问题。通过研究和借鉴世界典型国家关于行政复议和行政诉讼衔接模式的不同规定(包括美国的穷尽行政救济模式、德国的和诉讼类型相结合的模式以及法日的自由选择模式),并且立足于我们国家法制的现实发展水平,提出在确立司法最终原则的前提下,建构更适合我们国家国情、促进我国法制向前发展的衔接模式。通过一系列衔接模式的重新设定和建构,最终实现行政复议和行政诉讼两种救济方式的良好互动,更好地保护行政相对人的合法利益。
[Abstract]:As the two most important dispute resolution methods in the field of administrative law in our country, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation have many similarities and great differences. Influenced by the reality of our country, the connection mode of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation in our country includes four types: the free choice type, the review front type, the administrative reconsideration final type, and the direct prosecution type. At the same time, there are also a series of problems. By studying and drawing lessons from the different regulations of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation convergence model of typical countries in the world (including the exhausted administrative relief model of the United States), Based on the realistic development level of our country's legal system, this paper puts forward that, on the premise of establishing the ultimate principle of judicature, it is more suitable for the national conditions of our country. To promote the development of the legal system in China. Through the re-establishment and construction of a series of cohesive modes, the good interaction between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation can be realized, and the legitimate interests of administrative counterpart can be better protected.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】