公诉案件中当事人和解协议效力扩张及法律规制

发布时间：2018-06-29 18:08

本文选题：和解协议 + 协议效力扩张　；参考：《现代法学》2013年05期

【摘要】：公诉案件中当事人和解协议对公安司法机关具有约束力,协议内容和违约责任超出了普通民事协议的范围。当事人和解协议效力扩张具有理论依据、文化渊源和实践基础,还具有公正和效益价值,但也面临加害方以钱赎罪赎刑、被害方借罪借刑讹钱、追诉方借"议"枉法、裁判方借"议"擅断等多重风险。为依法防控这些风险,应完善和解程序,明确和解协议的附条件民事合同属性,将当事人达成和解协议规定为法定量刑情节和不起诉的法定依据之一,规定协议无效时无过错方可以要求过错方承担增加损害的民事赔偿责任或返还协议所得,规定和解过程中的事实陈述可以作为民事自认的特殊表现形式及适用民事简易程序的重要条件。
[Abstract]:In public prosecution cases, the parties' settlement agreement is binding on the public security judicial organs, and the contents of the agreement and the liability for breach of contract are beyond the scope of the ordinary civil agreement. The expansion of the validity of the parties' settlement agreement has theoretical basis, cultural origin and practical basis, and also has the value of justice and benefit. However, it is also faced with the offending party to redeem the penalty with money, the injured party to borrow the criminal false money from the crime, and the prosecution party to bend the law by "negotiation". There are many risks for the referee to take advantage of arbitrariness. In order to prevent and control these risks according to law, we should perfect the reconciliation procedure, clarify the conditional civil contract attribute of the settlement agreement, and stipulate the settlement agreement between the parties as one of the statutory sentencing circumstances and the legal basis for non-prosecution. If the agreement is invalid, the no-fault party may require the wrongdoing party to bear the civil liability for additional damage or return the proceeds of the agreement, The statement of facts in the process of settlement can be regarded as a special form of civil admission and an important condition for the application of civil summary procedure.
【作者单位】：河南大学法学院;
【基金】：2009年度国家社科基金项目“法官决策机制”(09BFX085)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】