多元化行政争议解决机制问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-01 10:19

本文选题：多元化行政争议解决机制 + 现行制度　；参考：《河北大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政争议解决机制，是指由行政主体设立或主持的非诉讼争议解决机制，包括行政调解、行政裁决、行政申诉等基本形式。行政争议解决机制的作用和发展反映了当代社会治理的需求，已逐步成为服务型政府为社会公众提供的一种公共服务资源。行政争议解决机制为当事人提供了一条区别于司法诉讼的公力救济途径，可以兼容协商性和裁决性程序，它将行政权力的能动性、直接性和高效性与协商性、衡平性和专门性结合起来，同时具有民间性ADR所不具备的专家优势和权力资源，容易取得当事人的信任。在特定争议的处理中，发挥着举足重轻的作用。如何将与行政救济制度相关联的构成要素通过科学的方式予以规范，使其形成一套运行有序、相互衔接、保障有力的多元化行政争议解决机制，从而保证行政争议公正、高效地得到解决，是本文研究的主要问题。文章首先阐述了多元化行政争议解决机制的基本理论，分析了争议、争议解决机制、行政争议解决机制的概念、构成要素、类型、功能、发展趋势等内容从而引出多元化行政争议解决机制的概念；其次对我国多元化行政争议解决机制的现状进行了分析，其中包括我国现行行政争议解决机制的基本形式与适用范围、功能与特点以及我国现行行政争议解决机制的主要特征和存在的主要问题；第三部分对域外行政争议解决机制进行比较研究，，简单介绍了英国、法国、日本等国家的代表制度并从中得到完善我国现行行政争议制度的一些启示；最后，从构建多元化行政争议解决机制、构建标准化行政争议解决机制、贯彻司法最终原则、重视非诉讼行政争议解决机制、努力把行政争议解决在行政程序内、改革和完善信访制度等六个方面阐述了完善我国多元化行政争议解决机制的基本构想。
[Abstract]:The administrative dispute settlement mechanism refers to the non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism established or presided over by the administrative subject, including administrative mediation, administrative adjudication, administrative appeal and other basic forms. The function and development of administrative dispute settlement mechanism reflect the needs of contemporary social governance and have gradually become a kind of public service resources provided by service-oriented government to the public. The administrative dispute settlement mechanism provides the parties with a way of public relief, which is different from the judicial proceedings and can be compatible with the consultative and adjudicative procedures. It brings about the initiative, directness, efficiency and negotiation of the administrative power. It is easy to gain the trust of the litigants because of the combination of balance and specialization, and at the same time, it has the advantage of experts and the resources of power which the folk ADR does not have. In the handling of specific disputes, it plays an important role. How to standardize the elements associated with the administrative relief system in a scientific way, so as to form a set of orderly operation, link up with each other, ensure a pluralistic mechanism of administrative dispute resolution, and thus ensure the fairness of administrative dispute. To be solved efficiently is the main problem studied in this paper. At first, the paper expounds the basic theory of the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism, and analyzes the concepts, elements, types and functions of the dispute resolution mechanism, the dispute settlement mechanism and the administrative dispute settlement mechanism. The development trend leads to the concept of pluralistic administrative dispute resolution mechanism. Secondly, it analyzes the present situation of the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism in China. It includes the basic form and scope of application, functions and characteristics of the current administrative dispute settlement mechanism, as well as the main characteristics and main problems of the current administrative dispute settlement mechanism in China. The third part carries on the comparative research to the extraterritorial administrative dispute settlement mechanism, briefly introduces the representative system of the United Kingdom, France, Japan and other countries and gets some enlightenment of perfecting the current administrative dispute system of our country. In order to solve administrative disputes, we should build a diversified administrative dispute settlement mechanism, construct a standardized administrative dispute settlement mechanism, implement the ultimate judicial principle, attach importance to the non-litigation administrative dispute settlement mechanism, and strive to resolve the administrative dispute in the administrative procedure. Six aspects, such as reforming and perfecting the system of letters and visits, expatiate on the basic conception of perfecting the pluralistic administrative dispute settlement mechanism in our country.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3;D922.1

【参考文献】