认罪认罚从宽审判程序的几点思考

发布时间：2018-07-03 00:36

本文选题：认罪认罚从宽 + 量刑协商　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：认罪认罚从宽制度是当前我国一项重要的司法改革,它是我国宽严相济刑事政策的制度化,体现了现代司法宽容、平和的理念。其目的在于推动案件繁简分流、优化司法资源配置和提高诉讼效率。通过对大陆法系和英美法系对该制度的比较研究发现,两大法系对于被告人认罪的案件都不再进行实质性审理,被告人认罪后一般也能得到量刑上的减让,不论哪一法系国家都会保障被告人的程序选择权、尽量保障诉讼程序的公正性,另外,辩诉协商在两大法系中都起到了重要作用,两大法系对适用这一程序被告人的上诉权也做了严格限制。反观我国的认罪认罚从宽程序,在制度层面上尚不规范,没有建立起完整的程序处理机制,辩诉协商的范围也需要进一步明确。目前,这一程序在审查起诉和审判阶段的适用最为普遍。因此需要在审前和审判过程中根据罪名的轻重和审判的难易程度对案件进行分流,这就需要协调速裁程序与简易程序的关系,构建协商程序,使程序的适用更加多元化。另外,在程序设计方面还要充分考虑尽量方便当事人,积极听取被害人意见,确立强制辩护制度,将该类型案件纳入法律援助的范围内,设立此类案件的上诉审查程序。
[Abstract]:The lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing is an important judicial reform in our country at present. It is the institutionalization of criminal policy of combining leniency and severe punishment and embodies the concept of modern judicial tolerance and peace. Its purpose is to promote the diversion of complex cases, optimize the allocation of judicial resources and improve the efficiency of litigation. Through a comparative study of the civil law system and the common law system, it is found that the cases in which the defendants plead guilty are no longer actually tried in the two legal systems, and the defendants can generally be given a reduction in sentencing after pleading guilty. No matter which legal system countries will protect the defendant's procedural right of choice and try to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, in addition, plea bargaining has played an important role in the two major legal systems. The two legal systems also severely restrict the defendant's right of appeal in applying this procedure. On the other hand, the lenient procedure of pleading guilty and penalizing in our country is not standardized at the system level, and the scope of plea bargaining needs to be further clarified. At present, this procedure is most widely used in the review of prosecution and trial stages. Therefore, it is necessary to divide the case according to the severity of the charge and the degree of difficulty in the trial, which requires the coordination of the relationship between the quick adjudication procedure and the summary procedure, the construction of the negotiation procedure, and the more diversified application of the procedure. In addition, in the design of the procedure, we should give full consideration to the convenience of the parties, actively listen to the views of the victims, establish the system of compulsory defense, bring this type of case into the scope of legal aid, and establish the appeal review procedure for such cases.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】