对刑事速裁程序保留被告人最后陈述的反思

发布时间：2018-07-15 13:03

【摘要】：为提高刑事案件的诉讼效率,我国自2014年开始对事实清楚、证据充分、被告人自愿认罪、当事人对适用法律没有争议的轻微刑事案件尝试适用速裁程序,两年来刑事速裁试点工作颇具成效。但是,刑事速裁程序中被告人最后陈述具有明显的消极性和非实质性,而且对法官影响甚微,难以发挥其应有的作用。简化被告人最后陈述这一程序可进一步缩短庭审时间,更好地实现刑事速裁程序的效率价值,并且不会对被告人权利造成实质性损害。将"应当听取被告人的最后陈述"改为"经申请应当准许被告人进行最后陈述",能够最大程度地兼顾速裁程序的价值取向和保障被告人权利的需要。
[Abstract]:In order to improve the efficiency of criminal cases, since 2014, China has been clear about the facts, sufficient evidence, the defendant voluntarily pleads guilty, and the parties try to apply the expedited procedure to minor criminal cases where the applicable law is not disputed. In the past two years, the trial work of quick adjudication of criminal cases has been quite effective. However, the final statement of the defendant has obvious negative and non-substantive characteristics, and has little influence on the judge, so it is difficult to play its due role. Simplifying the procedure of the defendant's final statement can further shorten the trial time, better realize the efficiency value of the criminal adjudication procedure, and will not cause substantial harm to the defendant's rights. Replace the words "the defendant shall be heard" with the words "the defendant shall be allowed to make the final statement upon application", which will maximize the balance between the value orientation of the expedited procedure and the need to protect the rights of the defendant.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】