我国执行异议之诉研究

发布时间：2018-07-16 11:45

【摘要】：“没有权利就没有救济”，救济就好比保障权利行使的基石，只有在救济制度更好的保障和护航之下，当事人的权利才能更好的行使，司法机关的执行工作也才能顺利进行。民事执行作为民事诉讼进程中的最后环节，它是为保证依法审理案件后作出的判决、裁定或其他法律文书的裁判内容及时得到兑现，我国人民法院的执行机关动用国家所赋予的强制力和法定的强制执行措施，并严格遵循法定程序强制负有法律义务的当事人依法履行其义务的有关民事执行行为。然而，在司法实践中由于民事执行涉及的领域比较广泛，经常会触及到多类主体的多种合法权利。由于执行依据有误或者执行人员素质问题等多种原因的存在，可能出现执行行为失当或违法会造成侵害案外人或当事人合法权利等不利后果，这就需要立法机关制定相应的救济手段对执行过程中受到侵害的权利人进行必要的救济和保护，即民事执行救济。事实上，执行救济工作质量的好坏，将直接影响到执行机关的强制执行工作的落实程度，也是实现公平、高效执行的关键环节。笔者首先从国内外执行救济制度的研究、发展为切入角度，具体阐述了提起执行异议之诉的不同事由以及条件，并运用比较论证的方法将不同的事由进行对比和说明。主要根据我国目前的国情，，对执行异议之诉制度的立法与司法实践进行分析，并就该制度中应当改进的地方提出自己的建议并阐述。最后，对未来司法实践中如何进一步完善我国执行异议之诉制度进行了思考，并且基于自己的研究和构想就执行异议之诉制度更好的运用于司法实务中建言献计。希望通过这些研究方法和理论能使我国未来的执行救济制度更加趋于公平、公正、合法和高效，对未来该制度的研究有借鉴的价值。
[Abstract]:"there is no right, there is no remedy", relief is like the cornerstone of safeguarding the exercise of rights. Only under the better protection and escort of the relief system, can the parties' rights be better exercised, and the execution of the judicial organs can be carried out smoothly. As the last link in the process of civil action, civil execution is to ensure that the adjudication content of the judgment, ruling or other legal documents made after hearing a case according to law is fulfilled in a timely manner. The executive organ of the people's court of our country uses the compulsory force and the legal enforcement measure given by the state, and strictly follows the legal procedure to enforce the relevant civil execution behavior of the parties who have the legal obligation to perform their obligations according to the law. However, in judicial practice, civil execution involves a wide range of fields, often touching on a variety of legal rights of multiple subjects. Due to the existence of many reasons, such as incorrect basis of execution or the quality of enforcement personnel, improper or illegal execution may result in adverse consequences such as infringing upon the legal rights of outsiders or parties involved in the case, This requires the legislature to make corresponding relief means to the obligee who has been infringed in the process of execution, that is, civil enforcement relief. In fact, the quality of the execution of relief work will directly affect the enforcement of the implementation of the degree of enforcement work, but also to achieve fair and efficient implementation of the key link. Firstly, from the perspective of the research of the enforcement relief system at home and abroad, the author concretely expounds the different reasons and conditions of bringing the action of dissent of execution, and compares and explains the different reasons by the method of comparison and demonstration. According to the current situation of our country, this paper analyzes the legislation and judicial practice of implementing the system of dissenting action, and puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of the system. Finally, the author thinks about how to further improve the system of execution dissent in the future judicial practice, and based on his own research and conception, the author makes a better use of the system in judicial practice. It is hoped that these research methods and theories can make the future execution relief system of our country more fair, just, legal and efficient, which is valuable for the future study of this system.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】