当事人诉讼行为的意思表示瑕疵--基于程序安定与意思自治双重维度的考查

发布时间：2018-07-24 22:09

【摘要】：当诉讼行为存在意思表示瑕疵时,是否允许行为人撤回或撤销,在学说上有肯定说与否定说。肯定说强调诉讼行为的意思要素,追求判决的妥当性;居于通说地位的否定说则强调诉讼行为的连续性,追求诉讼程序的迅速性与安定性。对该问题的处理集中反映了行为人的意思自治、程序安定性等不同利益的权衡与抉择。作为重要的参照,法律行为通过意思表示瑕疵的类型化,具体考量表意人与相对人利益保护的优先性,而分别采取意思主义与表示主义,并通过赔偿义务进一步均衡双方利益。这一既倡导意思自治又顾及相对人信赖利益的努力,可为重新考虑诉讼行为中的意思表示瑕疵问题提供借鉴。通过对诉讼行为及意思表示瑕疵的类型化,行为人意思、对方当事人利益及程序安定性有望获得妥善安排。
[Abstract]:There are positive and negative theories on whether to allow the actor to withdraw or withdraw when there is a defect in the expression of will. Affirmation emphasizes the meaning elements of litigation and pursues the appropriateness of judgment while the negation emphasizes the continuity of litigation and pursues the rapidity and stability of litigation procedure. The treatment of this problem reflects the balance and choice of different interests such as autonomy of will and stability of procedure. As an important reference, the legal act considers the priority of the protection of the interests of the ideographer and the relative party through the classification of the defects in the expression of will, and adopts the doctrine of intention and expressionism respectively, and further balances the interests of both parties through the obligation of compensation. This effort, which not only advocates autonomy of will but also takes into account the interests of relative trust, can be used for reference in reconsidering the defect of expression of will in litigation. Through the classification of the defects of litigation behavior and will, the intention of the actor, the interests of the other party and the procedural stability are expected to be properly arranged.
【作者单位】：国家检察官学院科研部;
【基金】：中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题[CLS(2016)C59]“庭审中心视角下的审前准备程序研究”
【分类号】：D925.1

【共引文献】