法院民事调解执行率高研究

发布时间：2018-07-28 17:00

【摘要】：法院民事调解的立法初衷是利用民事调解的比较性优势,减轻诉累,减少当事人和法院的负担,节约司法资源。在国家大力倡导"调解优先,调判结合"的今天,法官民事调解结案得到了法院的高度认同,调解成为了法院结案的首要选择,国家也把调解率作为各个法院评优、评先进的评判标准。但在司法实践中,调解结案的案件进入执行程序的比重越来越大,这完全背离了当初国家设立民事调解制度并且大力倡导调解结案的初衷,损害了司法权威。虽然在2012年,全国人大常务委员会通过了新的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》(以下简称《民诉法》),对民事调解制度做出了进一步完善,但调解制度还存在一些漏洞,加上法官对调解结案的偏爱,使得法院民事调解产生异化。因此,我国应结合实践找出应对的办法,使法院调解程序重新走上其应当运行之轨道。
[Abstract]:The original intention of court civil mediation is to make use of the comparative advantage of civil mediation, reduce the burden of litigant and court, and save judicial resources. Today, when the country strongly advocates the "mediation priority, the combination of mediation and adjudication", the civil mediation case of judges has been highly recognized by the court, and mediation has become the primary choice for the court to close the case. The state also regards the mediation rate as the best evaluation for each court. Comment on advanced criteria. However, in judicial practice, the proportion of cases closed by mediation into the execution procedure is increasing, which completely deviates from the original intention of establishing civil mediation system and strongly advocating the settlement of mediation, which damages the judicial authority. Although in 2012, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted the new Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil procedure Law) and further improved the civil mediation system, there are still some loopholes in the mediation system. In addition, the judge's preference for the settlement of mediation results in the alienation of civil mediation in the court. Therefore, our country should combine the practice to find out the corresponding method, so that the court mediation procedure should be put on the track of its operation again.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】