新刑诉法视野下检察机关适用刑事和解调查报告
发布时间：2018-08-01 10:32
【摘要】：刑事和解制度是指某些特定案件在犯罪嫌疑人、被告人真诚悔罪、被害人自愿和解的情况下，由公安、检察、法院任一单位进行主持，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人与被害方就民事、精神损害赔偿等方面达成合意协议，检察机关或审判机关根据和解协议等具体情况，对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人给予从宽处罚的一种制度。该制度正式引入刑事诉讼法，强化了检察机关及其办案人员的工作职责，丰富了检察机关监督职能内涵。新刑诉法实施近一年来，从湖南省检察机关适用刑事和解办案数量、和解适用的罪名、和解的内容、和解达成的方式以及和解案件的处理等具体执行方面的数据可以看出，司法操作中，因制度缺陷和主客观方面的原因，各地检察机关及其案件承办人在执行刑事和解时有不严格依法的现象，突出存在刑事和解价值理念模糊、办案效率低下、配套机制不够完善等问题。通过实证分析提出了树立正确的刑事和解价值理念、拓宽刑事和解案件范围、强化刑事和解案件无罪化处理、健全刑事和解案件被害人救助机制等路径设想。
[Abstract]:Criminal reconciliation system refers to certain specific cases in which the criminal suspect, the defendant sincerely repents, the victim voluntarily conciliates, is presided over by any unit of the public security, procuratorial, and court, and the criminal suspect, the defendant and the injured party are involved in the civil affairs, A system of lenient punishment for criminal suspects and defendants according to specific conditions such as conciliation agreements and so on. This system formally introduces the criminal procedure law, strengthens the procuratorial organ and its case handling personnel's work duty, enriches the procuratorial organ supervisory function connotation. In the nearly one year since the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, it can be seen from the number of criminal reconciliation cases handled by the procuratorial organs in Hunan Province, the charges applicable to the reconciliation, the content of the settlement, the way the settlement was reached, and the handling of the settlement cases, and so on. In the judicial operation, due to the defects of the system and the subjective and objective reasons, the procuratorial organs and their case handlers in various localities have the phenomenon of not strictly following the law in the execution of criminal reconciliation, which highlights the ambiguity of the value concept of criminal reconciliation and the inefficiency of handling cases. Supporting mechanism is not perfect and so on. Based on the empirical analysis, this paper puts forward some ideas of establishing the correct value of criminal reconciliation, widening the scope of criminal reconciliation cases, strengthening the innocent treatment of criminal reconciliation cases, and perfecting the relief mechanism of victims of criminal reconciliation cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2157288
[Abstract]:Criminal reconciliation system refers to certain specific cases in which the criminal suspect, the defendant sincerely repents, the victim voluntarily conciliates, is presided over by any unit of the public security, procuratorial, and court, and the criminal suspect, the defendant and the injured party are involved in the civil affairs, A system of lenient punishment for criminal suspects and defendants according to specific conditions such as conciliation agreements and so on. This system formally introduces the criminal procedure law, strengthens the procuratorial organ and its case handling personnel's work duty, enriches the procuratorial organ supervisory function connotation. In the nearly one year since the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, it can be seen from the number of criminal reconciliation cases handled by the procuratorial organs in Hunan Province, the charges applicable to the reconciliation, the content of the settlement, the way the settlement was reached, and the handling of the settlement cases, and so on. In the judicial operation, due to the defects of the system and the subjective and objective reasons, the procuratorial organs and their case handlers in various localities have the phenomenon of not strictly following the law in the execution of criminal reconciliation, which highlights the ambiguity of the value concept of criminal reconciliation and the inefficiency of handling cases. Supporting mechanism is not perfect and so on. Based on the empirical analysis, this paper puts forward some ideas of establishing the correct value of criminal reconciliation, widening the scope of criminal reconciliation cases, strengthening the innocent treatment of criminal reconciliation cases, and perfecting the relief mechanism of victims of criminal reconciliation cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭泽强;张高洁;;反思刑事和解制度[J];北方法学;2008年03期
2 马静华;罗宁;;西方刑事和解制度考略[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2006年01期
3 马秋生;;试论刑事和解下被害人保护与量刑社会化的关系——以交通肇事罪为视角[J];法制与社会;2013年04期
4 张书琴;;理性对待刑事和解[J];河北法学;2007年03期
5 赵国华;;中外刑事和解实践之概要比较[J];江苏大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
6 施鹏鹏;;法国刑事和解程序及其借鉴意义[J];社会科学辑刊;2006年06期
7 曾泉生;苏静;;重大刑事案件繁简分流的必要性与可行性探究[J];人民检察;2012年09期
8 郑红;;公诉裁量权透明化:以看得见的方式实现公正[J];人民检察;2012年09期
9 赵斌良;黄华生;;被害人国家救济立法的路径探讨[J];人民检察;2014年01期
10 姜敏;;中亚主要四国刑事和解研究[J];刑法论丛;2012年02期
，本文编号：2157288
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2157288.html
