国有土地上房屋征收与补偿行政诉讼问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-01 16:18
【摘要】：2014年《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》的修改,很多学者认为最大成就在于拓展了受案范围并修改了行政诉讼的判决方式,笔者对此也高度肯定。但以天津市为例,近几年国有土地房屋征收与补偿类案件的数量依然是有增无减。除此之外,全国各地因此而引发的暴力冲突也时而发生。究其原因,大多是因行政相对人无有效的救济手段,而被迫采用暴力手段对抗行政机关。这就说明在新法修改后,我国行政诉讼制度仍有问题亟待解决。本文可分为四部分:第一部分,分析国有土地房屋征收与补偿的概念、特点及与相关制度的区别。第二部分,分析该制度的问题,即通过查阅中国裁判文书网上的案例,找出国有土地房屋征收与补偿制度在诉讼上的问题,如受案范围窄、判决方式不统一等。第三部分,笔者查阅了相关大陆法系和英美法系国家的法律,通过中外对比的研究方法,进而在理性分析后得出一些有益借鉴。第四部分,根据上述对比,从而提出具体的解决措施,如改变受案范围的立法模式、增设预防性行政诉讼等,来试图解决国有土地上房屋征收与补偿案件的相关问题。此外,因为行政判决的种类应与行政诉讼受案范围及当事人的诉讼请求相适应,故笔者在提出修改受案范围的同时,也建议对行政判决的部分内容随之修改,从而实现判决类型与受案范围相匹配。
[Abstract]:In the revision of the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China in 2014, many scholars think that the greatest success lies in expanding the scope of accepting cases and modifying the judgment method of administrative litigation. However, taking Tianjin as an example, the number of cases of expropriation and compensation of state-owned land houses has been increasing in recent years. In addition, the resulting violence around the country also occurred from time to time. Most of the reasons are that the administrative counterpart has no effective remedy and is forced to use violent means against administrative organs. This shows that after the amendment of the new law, there are still some problems to be solved in our administrative litigation system. This paper can be divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the concept, characteristics and differences with related systems of the expropriation and compensation of state-owned land houses. The second part analyzes the problems of this system, that is, through consulting the online cases of China's adjudicative documents, the author finds out the problems in the litigation of the expropriation and compensation system of state-owned land houses, such as the narrow scope of accepting cases, the inconsistency of judgment methods, and so on. In the third part, the author looks up the laws of civil law system and common law system, and draws some useful reference after rational analysis through the comparative research methods between China and foreign countries. The fourth part, according to the above comparison, puts forward the concrete solution measures, such as changing the legislative mode of accepting the case scope, adding the preventive administrative lawsuit and so on, to try to solve the related problems of the housing expropriation and compensation cases on the state-owned land. In addition, since the types of administrative judgments should be adapted to the scope of the cases received in administrative proceedings and the litigant's requests, the author, while proposing to amend the scope of the cases, also suggests that some of the contents of the administrative judgments should be amended accordingly. In order to achieve the type of judgment and the scope of the case matching.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2158137
[Abstract]:In the revision of the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China in 2014, many scholars think that the greatest success lies in expanding the scope of accepting cases and modifying the judgment method of administrative litigation. However, taking Tianjin as an example, the number of cases of expropriation and compensation of state-owned land houses has been increasing in recent years. In addition, the resulting violence around the country also occurred from time to time. Most of the reasons are that the administrative counterpart has no effective remedy and is forced to use violent means against administrative organs. This shows that after the amendment of the new law, there are still some problems to be solved in our administrative litigation system. This paper can be divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the concept, characteristics and differences with related systems of the expropriation and compensation of state-owned land houses. The second part analyzes the problems of this system, that is, through consulting the online cases of China's adjudicative documents, the author finds out the problems in the litigation of the expropriation and compensation system of state-owned land houses, such as the narrow scope of accepting cases, the inconsistency of judgment methods, and so on. In the third part, the author looks up the laws of civil law system and common law system, and draws some useful reference after rational analysis through the comparative research methods between China and foreign countries. The fourth part, according to the above comparison, puts forward the concrete solution measures, such as changing the legislative mode of accepting the case scope, adding the preventive administrative lawsuit and so on, to try to solve the related problems of the housing expropriation and compensation cases on the state-owned land. In addition, since the types of administrative judgments should be adapted to the scope of the cases received in administrative proceedings and the litigant's requests, the author, while proposing to amend the scope of the cases, also suggests that some of the contents of the administrative judgments should be amended accordingly. In order to achieve the type of judgment and the scope of the case matching.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁凤云;;行政协议案件适用合同法的问题[J];中国法律评论;2017年01期
2 侯丹华;;新《行政诉讼法》中几种特殊类型诉讼的判决方式[J];法律适用;2016年08期
3 张越;;《行政诉讼法》修订的得失与期许[J];中国法律评论;2016年03期
4 王春业;;行政诉讼受案范围引入负面清单模式的思考[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2016年03期
5 黄雪娇;;论我国预防性行政诉讼之确立[J];理论月刊;2015年04期
6 徐朝建;;我国行政诉讼中适用成熟原则探究[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2014年02期
7 谭启平;;论房屋征收补偿争议的司法救济[J];当代法学;2013年05期
8 徐亚文;高一飞;;论国有土地上房屋征收决定公告的法律属性及救济途径[J];湖北社会科学;2013年06期
9 刘玉龙;;论行政诉讼禁止判决之建构[J];湖南警察学院学报;2013年02期
10 高宏文;;国家宪政体制与行政诉讼受案范围关系分析——比较法角度[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吴华;行政诉讼类型研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陈同香;我国行政合同诉讼研究[D];山东大学;2012年
2 李静;我国行政判决类型的分析和重构[D];山东大学;2010年
，本文编号：2158137
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2158137.html
