当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

认罪认罚从宽制度问题研究

发布时间:2018-08-12 19:51
【摘要】:中共十八届四中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》中,首次提出要完善刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽制度。最高人民法院《人民法院第四个五年改革纲要(2014-2018)》以及最高人民检察院《关于深化检察改革的意见(2013-2017年工作规划)》也提出要完善认罪认罚从宽制度。实际上,认罪认罚从宽制度在我国早已有之,《刑法》对此已有所规定,刑事诉讼中也有所体现。认罪认罚从宽制度的确立是宽严相济刑事政策在刑事诉讼中的必然要求,其目的是为了更好的实现繁简分流,优化司法资源配置,提高司法效率。学界近年来对认罪认罚从宽制度的相关问题进行了一定探讨,同时2016年9月3日,全国人大常委会通过了《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的决定》,11月16日,“两院三部”联合印发《关于在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽试点工作的办法》,这对刑事案件认罪认罚从宽试点工作的开展无疑具有重要指导意义。当然这实际上也必然会进一步促进对认罪认罚从宽制度理论研究的进一步深入。基于此,结合刑事案件认罪认罚从宽试点工作的进行,本文以认罪认罚从宽制度的内涵、价值等为切入点,对这一制度在我国刑法与刑事诉讼法中的体现进行了分析,重点对认罪认罚从宽制度的确立、存在的问题以及具体建构举措等问题进行了深入研究。笔者认为,认罪认罚从宽的启动程序、庭审程序、处理标准的细化以及协商程序等应当是试点工作和学界亟需进一步深入探索与探讨的问题。
[Abstract]:In the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on promoting the Rule of Law in an All-round way" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, it was proposed for the first time that the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing in criminal proceedings should be improved. The Supreme people's Court [the fourth Five-Year Reform outline of the people's Court (2014-2018)] and the Supreme people's Procuratorate's opinion on deepening the Procuratorial Reform (2013-2017 work Plan) also proposed that the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing should be improved. In fact, the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing has already existed in our country, which has been stipulated in the Criminal Law and reflected in the criminal procedure. The establishment of the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment is the inevitable requirement of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity in criminal proceedings. Its purpose is to better realize the diversion of complexity, optimize the allocation of judicial resources and improve judicial efficiency. In recent years, academic circles have made certain discussions about the system of leniency of plea, admission and punishment. On September 3, 2016, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC) adopted a decision on authorizing the Supreme people's Court. Decision of the Supreme people's Procuratorate on the pilot work on the system of lenient admission and punishment in Criminal cases in some regions. November 16, The joint publication of "three departments of the two Houses" on the pilot work on the leniency of plea and punishment in criminal cases in some regions is undoubtedly of great guiding significance to the implementation of the pilot work of leniency of plea and punishment in criminal cases. Of course, this will certainly further promote the further study of the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment. Based on this, combined with the trial work of leniency in criminal cases, this paper analyzes the embodiment of this system in our criminal law and criminal procedure law, taking the connotation and value of the system of guilty admission and punishment leniency as the starting point. It focuses on the establishment of lenient admission and punishment system, existing problems and concrete construction measures. The author believes that the lenient initiation procedure, trial procedure, fine processing standard and negotiation procedure should be the problems that need to be further explored and discussed in the experimental work and academic circles.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏爱军;王帅;;刑事案件犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自报身份情况调研[J];法制与社会;2008年31期

2 何允申;;怎样认识刑事案件持续上升的趋势[J];公安大学学报;1988年06期

3 赵进一;;无知酿成悲剧——本市外来人口刑事案件根源探[J];上海成人教育;1994年Z2期

4 郭浩善;论少年刑事案件审判中的观念转变[J];青少年犯罪问题;1997年04期

5 杜桂兰;李某的行为是否构成不移交刑事案件罪[J];当代法学;1999年S1期

6 曹勇;刑事案件公开审判中的几点注意事项[J];法律适用;1999年04期

7 ;中华全国律师协会关于律师办理刑事案件的十项要求[J];中国律师;1999年07期

8 肖祖瀚;;报复社会严重刑事案件激增的四大主因[J];中国经济周刊;2013年49期

9 何冰;;新加坡社会为何安定[J];人民文摘;2007年06期

10 ;信息[J];时代教育(先锋国家历史);2008年06期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 洪源;;m錾倌晷淌掳讣⺁u查制度的v|展、形成及其方戄和基本原RG[A];少年刑事司法制度学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年

2 甘雅玲;郭中伟;刘明辉;陈占河;;刑事案件中动物毛发的扫描电镜研究[A];第三届全国扫描电子显微学会议论文集[C];2003年

3 饶辉华;;10年100件公众关注刑事案件的普遍性问题探究[A];建设公平正义社会与刑事法律适用问题研究-全国法院第24届学术讨论会获奖论文集(上册)[C];2012年

4 吕娜娜;;论我国刑事案件二审开庭审理制度[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第1辑)[C];2008年

5 樊京京;;醉酒驾驶机动车刑事案件中血液酒精含量检测若干问题探讨[A];贵州法学(2014年第6期)[C];2014年

6 裴},

本文编号:2180178


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2180178.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0f273***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com