行政行为合理性的司法审查问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-29 18:31
【摘要】：随着行政裁量权的不断发展与逐步扩张,对政府行使行政权的标准有了更高的要求。政府的行政行为不仅要符合法律的规定,而且要具有合理性。合法性体现的是最基本的正义,而合理性表达的是较高程度的正义。合理性问题是合法性问题的延伸,是更深层次的合法性问题,是实质意义的合法性问题。行政法治是依法治国原则在行政法领域中的具体体现,行政法治的核心就在于实现对行政权的有效控制。孟德斯鸠曾说“一切有权力的人都容易滥用权力,这是万古不变的经验,有权力的人们使用权力一直遇到有界限的地方才休止。防止滥用权力的办法,就是以权力约束权力”。人民法院对行政行为进行司法审查对于维护公平正义和实现依法行政具有重要的意义。因此,对于行政权来说,司法审查是控制行政权最有效的方式和方法。我国现行的《行政诉讼法》仅规定了法院可以对行政行为进行合法性审查,对行政行为合理性即行政权行使是否合理的司法审查还没有做出进一步的规定。我国行政诉讼中单一性的司法审查原则与行政法治要求的合法性原则和合理性原则存在脱节,这不仅阻碍了司法审查理论的发展,而且在司法实践中行政机关合法但不合理的行政行为侵犯行政相对人合法利益的情况也时有发生,行政相对人在面对此种情况时因没有相应法律救济途径而往往处于尴尬境地。因此,笔者在文章中重点对行政行为合理性的司法审查做一些分析和探讨,希望对相关理论和司法实践有所帮助。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development and gradual expansion of administrative discretion, there are higher requirements for the government to exercise administrative power. The administrative behavior of the government should not only conform to the law, but also be reasonable. Legitimacy embodies the most basic justice, while rationality expresses a higher degree of justice. Rationality problem is an extension of legitimacy problem, a deeper legitimacy problem and a legitimacy problem of substantive significance. The administrative rule of law is the concrete embodiment of the principle of governing the country according to law in the field of administrative law. The core of the administrative rule of law lies in the effective control of the administrative power. Montesquieu once said, "all people who have power are apt to abuse power. It is an everlasting experience. The way to prevent abuse of power is to restrain power by power. " The judicial review of administrative acts by people's courts is of great significance to the maintenance of fairness and justice and the realization of administration according to law. Therefore, for administrative power, judicial review is the most effective way to control administrative power. The current Administrative procedure Law of our country only stipulates that the court may examine the legality of the administrative act, and there is no further regulation on the rationality of the administrative act, that is, the judicial review of whether the exercise of the administrative power is reasonable or not. There is a disconnection between the principle of single judicial review and the principle of legality and rationality, which not only hinders the development of the theory of judicial review. And in judicial practice, the legal but unreasonable administrative acts of administrative organs infringe on the legitimate interests of the administrative counterpart also occur from time to time, administrative counterpart in the face of such a situation because there is no corresponding legal remedies and often in an awkward situation. Therefore, the author makes some analysis and discussion on the judicial review of the rationality of administrative behavior in the article, hoping to be helpful to the relevant theory and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2212053
[Abstract]:With the continuous development and gradual expansion of administrative discretion, there are higher requirements for the government to exercise administrative power. The administrative behavior of the government should not only conform to the law, but also be reasonable. Legitimacy embodies the most basic justice, while rationality expresses a higher degree of justice. Rationality problem is an extension of legitimacy problem, a deeper legitimacy problem and a legitimacy problem of substantive significance. The administrative rule of law is the concrete embodiment of the principle of governing the country according to law in the field of administrative law. The core of the administrative rule of law lies in the effective control of the administrative power. Montesquieu once said, "all people who have power are apt to abuse power. It is an everlasting experience. The way to prevent abuse of power is to restrain power by power. " The judicial review of administrative acts by people's courts is of great significance to the maintenance of fairness and justice and the realization of administration according to law. Therefore, for administrative power, judicial review is the most effective way to control administrative power. The current Administrative procedure Law of our country only stipulates that the court may examine the legality of the administrative act, and there is no further regulation on the rationality of the administrative act, that is, the judicial review of whether the exercise of the administrative power is reasonable or not. There is a disconnection between the principle of single judicial review and the principle of legality and rationality, which not only hinders the development of the theory of judicial review. And in judicial practice, the legal but unreasonable administrative acts of administrative organs infringe on the legitimate interests of the administrative counterpart also occur from time to time, administrative counterpart in the face of such a situation because there is no corresponding legal remedies and often in an awkward situation. Therefore, the author makes some analysis and discussion on the judicial review of the rationality of administrative behavior in the article, hoping to be helpful to the relevant theory and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张瑞强;;对非诉行政行为应适用合法性兼顾合理性司法审查原则[J];人民司法;2015年19期
2 刘婷;;行政自由裁量权的司法规制——合理性审查原则的采用[J];经济研究导刊;2014年06期
3 王传干;;行政裁量基准的司法审查[J];广东行政学院学报;2013年01期
4 江必新;;行政程序正当性的司法审查[J];中国社会科学;2012年07期
5 黄垣;;论行政合理性司法审查[J];法制与经济(下半月);2008年01期
6 周敏生;;浅淡我国确立行政合理性司法审查制度的设想[J];中国集体经济(下半月);2007年09期
7 李爽;王思成;;论行政合理性的司法审查[J];山东电大学报;2007年03期
8 程方升;;和谐社会取向下行政合理性司法审查:失范与规制[J];法制与社会;2007年07期
9 杜丰;;论对行政行为合理性的司法审查[J];产业与科技论坛;2007年03期
10 郑英;;论行政合理性原则在司法审查中的运用[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2006年05期
，本文编号：2212053
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2212053.html
