民行交叉案件诉讼机制研究
发布时间：2018-09-06 19:17
【摘要】：行政争议与民事争议交织的问题近年来越来越受到实务和理论界的关注,已然成为困扰审判实践的一个难题。但在审判实践中长期存在认识不统一、审判不统一、法律机制构建不完善的问题,使得审判实践中民行交叉案件的处理成为一个乱象,各法院在审判程序、法律适用和裁判结果上均存在较大的差异。本文作者作为一名审判实务中的工作者,也深切感受到寻求一条解决民行交叉问题有效路径的迫切性,本文欲厘清民行交叉案件中的复杂关系,为统一民行交叉案件诉讼机制提出自己的观点,希望对统一审判实务者的认识,为我国目前尚无完整系统又无具体法律规定与实践运作规则的法律层面提供一定参考。本文在引言部分通过对三个典型案件的分析,引出了民行交叉案件在实践中产生的很多问题,如裁判思路不统一、民行判决产生矛盾、审理周期长、导致当事人诉累,总结出了本文所要解决的问题:探索民行交叉问题的解决方法。第一部分阐述了民行交叉案件及问题产生的根源,并从民行交叉案件产生的情形、产生的基础关系为标准对其进行了分类,为解决民行交叉问题提供理论基础支持。第二部分设计了防止民行交叉案件各类问题产生的合理诉讼模式。首先,介绍了理论上的各种诉讼模式;其次,在现行诉讼机制下分析民行交叉案件问题的解决方法,设计出合理的裁判路径。第三部分在分析了民行交叉案件本质问题的基础上,提出解决民行交叉问题的最终方法,并提出了单一诉讼模式和民行合一模式两种模式,希望对现有民行交叉制度的构建进行完善和改革。
[Abstract]:The intertwining of administrative dispute and civil dispute has attracted more and more attention in the field of practice and theory in recent years, which has become a difficult problem puzzling trial practice. However, for a long time in trial practice, the problems of inconsistent understanding, inconsistent trial and imperfect construction of legal mechanism have made the handling of intersecting cases between the people and the people in trial practice a mess, and the courts are in the trial procedure. There are great differences in the application of law and the result of judgment. As a worker in trial practice, the author of this paper also feels the urgency of seeking an effective way to solve the problem of the intersection of civil conduct and conduct. In order to unify the litigation mechanism of civil intersecting cases, the author puts forward his own viewpoint and hopes that the understanding of the unified trial practitioners can provide a certain reference for the legal level of our country that there is no complete system and no specific legal provisions and practical operational rules at present. In the introduction part, through the analysis of the three typical cases, it leads to a lot of problems in the practice of the people's Bank Cross cases, such as the inconsistent thinking of the referee, the contradiction of the people's execution judgment, the long trial period, and the litigants' litigation tiredness. This paper summarizes the problems to be solved: to explore the solution to the problem of the intersection of civil conduct. The first part expounds the origin of the civil and bank cross cases and the origin of the problems, and classifies them according to the situation of the people's and banks' cross cases, and provides the theoretical basis for solving the problems of people's and banks' crossing The second part designs the reasonable litigation mode to prevent all kinds of problems. Firstly, it introduces the various litigation modes in theory. Secondly, it analyzes the solution to the problem of civil conduct cross cases under the current litigation mechanism, and designs a reasonable judgment path. In the third part, on the basis of analyzing the essence of the civil behavior cross case, the author puts forward the final method to solve the problem, and puts forward two modes: the single litigation mode and the combination of people and action mode. The author hopes to perfect and reform the existing civil-bank cross-system.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1;D925.3
本文编号：2227284
[Abstract]:The intertwining of administrative dispute and civil dispute has attracted more and more attention in the field of practice and theory in recent years, which has become a difficult problem puzzling trial practice. However, for a long time in trial practice, the problems of inconsistent understanding, inconsistent trial and imperfect construction of legal mechanism have made the handling of intersecting cases between the people and the people in trial practice a mess, and the courts are in the trial procedure. There are great differences in the application of law and the result of judgment. As a worker in trial practice, the author of this paper also feels the urgency of seeking an effective way to solve the problem of the intersection of civil conduct and conduct. In order to unify the litigation mechanism of civil intersecting cases, the author puts forward his own viewpoint and hopes that the understanding of the unified trial practitioners can provide a certain reference for the legal level of our country that there is no complete system and no specific legal provisions and practical operational rules at present. In the introduction part, through the analysis of the three typical cases, it leads to a lot of problems in the practice of the people's Bank Cross cases, such as the inconsistent thinking of the referee, the contradiction of the people's execution judgment, the long trial period, and the litigants' litigation tiredness. This paper summarizes the problems to be solved: to explore the solution to the problem of the intersection of civil conduct. The first part expounds the origin of the civil and bank cross cases and the origin of the problems, and classifies them according to the situation of the people's and banks' cross cases, and provides the theoretical basis for solving the problems of people's and banks' crossing The second part designs the reasonable litigation mode to prevent all kinds of problems. Firstly, it introduces the various litigation modes in theory. Secondly, it analyzes the solution to the problem of civil conduct cross cases under the current litigation mechanism, and designs a reasonable judgment path. In the third part, on the basis of analyzing the essence of the civil behavior cross case, the author puts forward the final method to solve the problem, and puts forward two modes: the single litigation mode and the combination of people and action mode. The author hopes to perfect and reform the existing civil-bank cross-system.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1;D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵江风;;物权法区分原则：房屋登记民行交叉案件的裁判路径[J];山东审判;2012年04期
2 叶飞;;不动产登记中的民行交叉问题[J];法制与社会;2011年32期
3 公衍义;;论民行交叉纠纷实质性化解的途径——兼论行政行为效力中止制度[J];山东审判;2011年03期
4 李佳;;论民行交叉案件现行处理模式中存在的风险及其预防[J];法学杂志;2011年05期
5 姚虹;;论不动产登记制度之完善[J];学术交流;2011年03期
6 宁杰;;民行交叉诉讼中基础诉讼的确定[J];人民司法;2011年01期
7 章晓民;谢红丹;;浅议房地产登记案件中的民行交叉问题[J];法制与社会;2010年35期
8 曹婧;;房屋权属纠纷诉讼机制探析——以民行交叉为背景展开[J];西南政法大学学报;2010年05期
9 李佳;;民行交叉案件法律责任之法理分析[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
10 陈耀东;杨雅婷;;试论不动产登记案件的民行交叉问题[J];中国房地产;2010年05期
，本文编号：2227284
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2227284.html
