刑事诉讼的程序性制裁制度研究
[Abstract]:At present, with the increasing attention to the protection of human rights in our country, the laws of our country are constantly being perfected and perfected. Therefore, the procedural sanction system of criminal procedure, as a judicial system to protect human rights, has become an indispensable aspect in modern society. Establishing procedural sanction system and realizing social justice through procedural sanction has become a universal practice in the world. Up to now, there are only two kinds of procedural sanction system in our criminal procedure law: illegal evidence is excluded and annulled, and the system of retrial is sent back. However, as far as the development of procedural sanctions system is concerned, due to the late start time, people's weak legal consciousness, lack of relevant professionals, imperfect system and so on, The only two procedural sanctions systems in our country have great deficiencies in legislation and judicial practice. There are still many problems in the development of this system, and many aspects need to be perfected. The superiority of this system has not been fully reflected, and has also restricted the development of the socialist society ruled by law in a certain sense. In this paper, the value of procedural sanctions is first expounded, and the unique advantages of procedural sanctions are revealed. Then, the concept of procedural sanctions is introduced, including the object of sanctions, the characteristics of sanctions and the way of sanctions. This paper analyzes the present situation of the procedural sanction system in our country, in addition, it investigates the procedural sanction system of foreign criminal procedure, which is helpful for our country to draw lessons from foreign experience. Finally, it puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the procedural sanction system. It is an important aspect of building a society ruled by law to study and perfect the procedural sanction system of our country. It is better to safeguard the rights and interests, but also to promote the socialist judicial process in China, to maintain social harmony and stability.
【学位授予单位】:中南林业科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈瑞华;;程序性制裁制度的法理学分析[J];中国检察官;2006年01期
2 赵康英;;浅观程序性制裁制度的发展——读《程序性制裁理论》有感[J];法制与社会;2007年07期
3 陈奎棠;;论建立程序违法的程序性制裁制度[J];中共贵州省委党校学报;2013年01期
4 赵婧;艾丽燕;;程序性制裁解构——以刑事程序为范例[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年03期
5 王建英;;刑事程序性制裁确立之考量[J];武警学院学报;2007年01期
6 相昭年;;论我国程序性制裁制度的构建[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2008年04期
7 陈曦;;程序性制裁之“程序性”分析——以程序性制裁内在区分为视角[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年06期
8 刘忠;;被识别的几率:非法取证程序性制裁的构成性前提[J];中外法学;2011年02期
9 蔡芳芳;;程序性制裁理论的缺陷及完善[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2011年02期
10 黄忠顺;;民事程序性制裁理论的基础性构建[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2012年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 孙厚祥;;关于完善我国刑事诉讼程序性违法裁判机制的法理思考[A];第二届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 赵精武 于建新 中国人民大学法学院;以程序性制裁实现公平正义[N];人民公安报;2013年
2 中国人民大学博士研究生 温克志;遏制刑讯与程序性制裁和制约[N];法制日报;2010年
3 仇晓敏 林晓东;实践智慧、方法创新与人文关怀[N];法制日报;2006年
4 天津医科大学 舒扬;证人出庭且看“程序性制裁”[N];人民法院报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 徐德臣;民事诉讼程序性制裁机制研究[D];西南政法大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王长鹏;我国刑事程序性制裁制度研究[D];山东政法学院;2016年
2 权艳平;我国程序性辩护困境之解[D];山东大学;2016年
3 秦繁繁;我国刑事诉讼程序性制裁制度研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
4 郭雪螺;刑事诉讼的程序性制裁制度研究[D];中南林业科技大学;2017年
5 周玉珠;刑事诉讼程序性制裁研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
6 谢元胜;程序性制裁制度研究[D];西南大学;2010年
7 李险峰;程序性制裁问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
8 田莉;刑事程序性制裁制度研究[D];西南民族大学;2010年
9 王建英;论刑事程序性制裁制度[D];中国政法大学;2005年
10 李敬阳;刑事程序性制裁制度问题研究[D];河北大学;2006年
,本文编号:2242141
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2242141.html