论我国认罪协商制度的构建
发布时间：2018-09-18 20:47
【摘要】：认罪协商制度起源于辩诉交易,旨在提高诉讼效率,解决“案多人少”的矛盾。构建认罪协商制度是弥补我国现行刑事从宽制度缺陷、提高诉讼效率、实现特殊预防刑罚目的、完善“认罪认罚从宽制度”、推进“审判中心主义”改革的需要。我国传统协商文化、当事人主义诉讼模式及司法实践为该制度的构建提供了可能。构建我国的认罪协商制度应遵循合法、自愿、兼顾公平与效率及法院审查的原则,该制度排除特殊罪名及重罪的适用,限于量刑协商,必须达到案件事实清楚,证据确实、充分的证明标准,控辩双方、被害人、法官均享有程序参与权,但被害人和法官没有程序启动权,制度适用于审查起诉及检察官提起诉讼后法院开庭审理前的阶段,法院通过公开开庭审理对协商内容进行审查。认罪协商案件被告人享有有限上诉权,被害人有权对协商内容提出异议,检察机关有权撤回协商。确立沉默权、证据开示制度、完善法律援助制度是被追诉人协商自愿性、明智性、真实性的保障,是认罪协商制度存在和发展的前提。
[Abstract]:Plea bargaining system originates from plea bargaining, which aims to improve the efficiency of litigation and solve the contradiction of "more cases than fewer people". The construction of plea bargaining system is necessary to make up for the defects of the current criminal leniency system in China, to improve the efficiency of litigation, to achieve the purpose of special preventive punishment, to perfect the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment, and to promote the reform of "trial centrism". The traditional negotiation culture, litigant litigation mode and judicial practice provide the possibility for the construction of this system. To construct the plea bargaining system of our country should follow the principles of legality, voluntary, fairness and efficiency, and court review. This system excludes the application of special charges and felonies, and is limited to sentencing negotiation. It must be clear in the facts of the case and the evidence is true. Adequate standards of proof, in which both the prosecution and the defence, the victims and the judges have the right to participate in the proceedings, but the victims and the judges do not have the right to initiate the proceedings, and the system applies to the period leading up to the court hearing after the review of the prosecution and the prosecution by the Prosecutor, The court examined the contents of the consultation through a public hearing. The defendant has the limited right of appeal, the victim has the right to object to the negotiation content, and the procuratorial organ has the right to withdraw the negotiation. The establishment of the right to silence, the discovery of evidence system and the perfection of the legal aid system are the guarantee of voluntary negotiation, wisdom and authenticity of the prosecution, and are the premise of the existence and development of the plea bargaining system.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:Plea bargaining system originates from plea bargaining, which aims to improve the efficiency of litigation and solve the contradiction of "more cases than fewer people". The construction of plea bargaining system is necessary to make up for the defects of the current criminal leniency system in China, to improve the efficiency of litigation, to achieve the purpose of special preventive punishment, to perfect the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment, and to promote the reform of "trial centrism". The traditional negotiation culture, litigant litigation mode and judicial practice provide the possibility for the construction of this system. To construct the plea bargaining system of our country should follow the principles of legality, voluntary, fairness and efficiency, and court review. This system excludes the application of special charges and felonies, and is limited to sentencing negotiation. It must be clear in the facts of the case and the evidence is true. Adequate standards of proof, in which both the prosecution and the defence, the victims and the judges have the right to participate in the proceedings, but the victims and the judges do not have the right to initiate the proceedings, and the system applies to the period leading up to the court hearing after the review of the prosecution and the prosecution by the Prosecutor, The court examined the contents of the consultation through a public hearing. The defendant has the limited right of appeal, the victim has the right to object to the negotiation content, and the procuratorial organ has the right to withdraw the negotiation. The establishment of the right to silence, the discovery of evidence system and the perfection of the legal aid system are the guarantee of voluntary negotiation, wisdom and authenticity of the prosecution, and are the premise of the existence and development of the plea bargaining system.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 谭世贵;;构建中国认罪协商制度研究[J];浙江工商大学学报;2010年02期
2 陈国庆;;试论构建中国式的认罪协商制度[J];环球法律评论;2006年05期
3 王小光;李琴;;台湾地区认罪协商程序的引进和运作情况分析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2013年02期
4 俞波涛;周少华;;刑罚正当化语境下的认罪协商[J];国家检察官学院学报;2013年03期
5 王晓辉;;认罪协商程序的实体侧面解读[J];河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年04期
6 邓楚开;杨献国;;构建中国式认罪协商制度的实践探索——浙江省绍兴市基层检察机关认罪轻案程序改革实证分析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年12期
7 罗永志;;认罪也可以协商[J];大科技(百科新说);2012年02期
8 李婷;;我国台湾地区刑事协商程序初探[J];公民与法(法学版);2010年02期
9 段明学;;论构建多元化的认罪案件处理程序[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2009年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 北京市人民检察院 杨江波;加拿大的认罪协商制度及对我国的借鉴[N];检察日报;2008年
2 陈界融;“认罪协商”的司法实践观察[N];光明日报;2007年
3 本报特约记者 木曰;扁家弊案六被告认罪协商遭拒[N];人民日报海外版;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 吴f，
本文编号：2249061
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2249061.html
