刑民交叉案件处理机制研究
发布时间：2018-09-19 09:34
【摘要】：刑民交叉案件是一类特殊的案件，因涉及刑事诉讼程序与民事诉讼程序，，两种程序极易产生冲突，长期以来困扰着司法实践活动。随着现代经济社会的快速发展，刑民交叉案件频繁发生，导致错综复杂的法律关系越来越多，引起了法学实务界和理论界的广泛重视，但关于刑民交叉案件的本质特征、刑民交叉案件的诉讼模式以及相关法律规定依据等方面尚缺乏系统科学统一的研究。为最大限度地保护当事人的合法权益，必须完善刑民交叉案件处理机制，营造一个良好的法治环境。本文在现行立法和司法解释体系范围内，对刑民交叉的处理机制进行了简要的分析。本文正文分为三个部分： 第一章：刑民交叉案件概述，简要概述了刑民交叉问题的发展历史、概念、刑民交叉问题冲突的表现形式，并且对刑民交叉案件进行了类型化分析； 第二章：刑民交叉案件的传统诉讼模式—先刑后民，针对现行立法和司法解释的规定，从学术和实践角度分析“先刑后民”模式的概念、现实意义及反思其弊端，并简要论述了我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的主要内容及其缺陷； 第三章：刑民交叉案件处理机制的完善对策。针对目前处理刑民交叉案件出现的问题，概括了处理刑民交叉案件的原则，应建立刑民交叉案件多元化的处理机制，并提出了完善我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的几点建议。
[Abstract]:Criminal and civil cross cases are a special kind of cases, because of the criminal procedure and civil procedure, the two procedures are prone to conflict, which has been puzzling judicial practice for a long time. With the rapid development of modern economy and society, the frequent occurrence of criminal and civil cross cases leads to more and more complicated legal relations, which has aroused wide attention in the field of legal practice and theory, but about the essential characteristics of criminal and civil crossover cases. There is a lack of systematic and scientific research on the mode of litigation and the basis of relevant laws and regulations in criminal and civil cross cases. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, it is necessary to perfect the handling mechanism of criminal cases and create a good legal environment. In the current legislative and judicial interpretation system, this paper makes a brief analysis of the mechanism of dealing with the intersection of criminal and civilian. The text of this paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter: the summary of criminal and civilian cross cases, a brief overview of the development history, concept, conflict forms of criminal and civil crossover issues. The second chapter: the traditional litigation mode of criminal and civil cross cases-the first punishment before the people, in view of the current legislation and judicial interpretation of the provisions, From the angle of academic and practice, this paper analyzes the concept, realistic significance and reflection on the malpractice of the mode of "first punishment before the people", and briefly discusses the main contents and defects of the system of civil suit incidental to criminal procedure in our country. The third chapter: the perfect countermeasure of handling mechanism of criminal-civilian cross-cases. In view of the problems existing in handling criminal and civil cross-cases at present, this paper summarizes the principles of dealing with such cases, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of civil suit incidental to criminal cases.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1;D925.2
本文编号：2249744
[Abstract]:Criminal and civil cross cases are a special kind of cases, because of the criminal procedure and civil procedure, the two procedures are prone to conflict, which has been puzzling judicial practice for a long time. With the rapid development of modern economy and society, the frequent occurrence of criminal and civil cross cases leads to more and more complicated legal relations, which has aroused wide attention in the field of legal practice and theory, but about the essential characteristics of criminal and civil crossover cases. There is a lack of systematic and scientific research on the mode of litigation and the basis of relevant laws and regulations in criminal and civil cross cases. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, it is necessary to perfect the handling mechanism of criminal cases and create a good legal environment. In the current legislative and judicial interpretation system, this paper makes a brief analysis of the mechanism of dealing with the intersection of criminal and civilian. The text of this paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter: the summary of criminal and civilian cross cases, a brief overview of the development history, concept, conflict forms of criminal and civil crossover issues. The second chapter: the traditional litigation mode of criminal and civil cross cases-the first punishment before the people, in view of the current legislation and judicial interpretation of the provisions, From the angle of academic and practice, this paper analyzes the concept, realistic significance and reflection on the malpractice of the mode of "first punishment before the people", and briefly discusses the main contents and defects of the system of civil suit incidental to criminal procedure in our country. The third chapter: the perfect countermeasure of handling mechanism of criminal-civilian cross-cases. In view of the problems existing in handling criminal and civil cross-cases at present, this paper summarizes the principles of dealing with such cases, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of civil suit incidental to criminal cases.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1;D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 邹开红,胡寅,宋鱼水;专题研讨:“先刑后民”司法原则问题研究[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2004年04期
2 赵文艳;;先刑后民原则的异化与扬弃——兼论刑民交叉案件的处理模式[J];福建警察学院学报;2009年01期
3 陈杰人;打破“先刑后民”是私权回归的要求[J];法律与生活;2005年02期
4 朱军;汪强;相明;;刑民交叉案件处理机制的重新构建[J];法制与社会;2009年25期
5 赵秉志,田宏杰;刑事司法正义论[J];中国刑事法杂志;2000年06期
6 刘少军;;论“先民后刑”刑事附带民事诉讼程序的构建——兼论《刑事诉讼法修正案》对附带民事诉讼制度的改革[J];政治与法律;2012年11期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 徐艳阳;刑民交叉问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
本文编号：2249744
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2249744.html
