刍论我国民事执行时效制度之立法修正

发布时间：2018-10-11 12:00

【摘要】：对民事执行时效的性质、效力等的认识与请求时效制度的正确建构,关系到民事执行请求权保障的程度。长期以来,理论界对民事执行申请期限性质的认识,形成了"除斥期间说""法定期间说""诉讼时效说"等,并不同程度上影响了民事执行时效制度的立法。从对民事执行时效性质的再认识,反观我国民事诉讼法第239条所确定之民事执行时效制度,源于认识错误所导致的制度设计弊端显而易见。为保障民事执行请求权,民事执行时效制度亟待立法修正,应当借民法典编纂之机,将民事执行时效制度置于民事实体法立法之中,平衡实体法与程序法上时效制度之冲突,并完善民事执行时效届满后的效力认定程序。
[Abstract]:The understanding of the nature and validity of the civil execution limitation and the correct construction of the system of the limitation of limitation for civil execution are related to the degree of the protection of the right of civil execution. For a long time, the theory circle's understanding of the nature of civil application for execution has formed "the theory of excluding the period of reprimand", "the theory of legal period", "the theory of limitation of action", and so on, which does not affect the legislation of the system of limitation of civil execution to the same extent. From the re-understanding of the nature of civil execution limitation, the system of civil execution limitation determined by Article 239 of the Civil procedure Law of China is obviously due to the defects of the system design caused by the mistake of cognition. In order to protect the civil execution claim, the civil execution limitation system needs to be amended by legislation urgently. It should take the opportunity of compiling the civil code to put the civil execution limitation system into the civil substantive law legislation, and balance the conflict between the substantive law and the limitation system in the procedural law. And consummates the validity confirmation procedure after the civil execution limitation period expires.
【作者单位】：安阳师范学院;
【基金】：河南省哲学社会科学规划课题“民事执行请求权保障机制研究”(2014CFX020) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国民事诉讼一审程序实证研究(1949-2013)”(14AFX015)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】