法庭内的正义如何实现——最高人民法院刑事诉讼司法解释中法庭纪律及相关规定

发布时间：2018-10-12 13:19

【摘要】：最高人民法院新刑事诉讼法司法解释对"法庭纪律与其他规定"相关条文的解释不尽合理,且与现行法律相冲突,存在着超越法律的自我授权、越权解释等问题。其中,禁止诉讼参与人、旁听人员发送邮件、博客、微博传播庭审情况的规定过于僵化,不利于公众司法知情权、监督权和表达权的行使,且在具体操作上存在着技术难题。而对新闻记者报道所实行的许可制度也面临着许可条件的明确化、许可对象的平等性等问题。有关驱逐出庭的规则,存在着如何看待和界定"扰乱法庭秩序"的问题、公诉人是否受法庭规则约束的问题、被告人被驱逐出庭后的程序设置问题以及辩护人被驱逐出庭后能否继续参与本案辩护的问题。"解释"还在法律之外创设了"另案处理"制度,由于缺乏操作性规则,执行中必然会面临一系列程序问题,对这种新型案件处理方式亟待予以规范。有关辩护人不受限制的当庭拒绝辩护的规定,不仅与我国《律师法》规定相抵牾,而且会损害被告人利益、降低审判效率,从长远看也不利于我国法律援助制度的健康发展,应尽快作出修正。
[Abstract]:The judicial interpretation of the new Criminal procedure Law of the Supreme people's Court is not reasonable and conflicts with the current law. There are some problems, such as surpassing the law's self-authorization and overrunning the power of interpretation. Among them, the prohibition of litigation participants, observers to send emails, blogs, Weibo dissemination of court proceedings is too rigid, is not conducive to the public judicial right to know, supervision and expression of the right to exercise, and there are technical problems in the specific operation. However, the license system for journalists also faces some problems, such as the clarity of licensing conditions and the equality of license objects. The question of how to view and define the "disturbance of court order" and whether the prosecutor is bound by the rules of the court exists with regard to the rules governing the expulsion of a court of law. The question of the procedure following the expulsion of the accused and the question of whether the defender can continue to participate in the defence of the case after his expulsion. " Explanation "also created the system of" dealing with other cases "outside the law, because of the lack of operational rules, the implementation will inevitably face a series of procedural problems, this new way of handling cases needs to be standardized. The provisions concerning the refusal of defenders to defend in court without restrictions will not only contradict the provisions of the Law on lawyers in China, but will also damage the interests of the accused and reduce the efficiency of the trial. In the long run, it will also be detrimental to the healthy development of the legal aid system in our country. Amendments should be made as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：四川省社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】