民事诉讼中间确认判决研究

发布时间：2018-10-15 20:44

【摘要】：中间确认判决,是指在民事诉讼过程中,终局判决作出前,法院对当事人的诉讼请求所基于的先决法律关系或基础权利存在与否的争议和事实所作出的判决。中间确认判决制度的确立,旨在保障当事人的诉讼权利行使、提升审判的质效以及促进当事人合意解决纠纷。遗憾的是,我国对中间确认判决的立法尚处于空白状态,而在理论上虽然对中间判决的研究较多,但对中间确认判决进行深入研究的却凤毛麟角,即使部分中间判决的研究提到了中间确认判决,其也仅局限于中间确认判决概念的简单介绍,以至于学界至今还未对中间确认判决引起足够的重视,从而导致我国现行司法实践对中间争点的判定方式产生出许多问题。笔者旨在对这个研究盲点作出尝试性的论证,从剖析中间确认判决制度的理论基础出发,比较借鉴域外相关的规定,提出构建我国中间确认判决制度的立法建议,藉此试图为合理解决民事诉讼中出现的实体性中间争点提供一剂良方。本文紧紧围绕民事诉讼中间确认判决制度这一主题展开,分为前言、正文、结语三部分。各个部分的主要内容如下:前言:简要论述民事诉讼中间确认判决制度以及在我国民事诉讼设置中间确认判决的重要性。第一章:对中间确认判决制度的基本理论进行剖析,并考察与其相关的域外立法。内容涉及中间确认判决的概念及其界分、性质、理论基础以及德国、日本、我国台湾地区的对中间确认判决的立法等方面。第二章:分析我国在民事中间确认判决制度缺失下的实践状况。在剖析我国现行对中间争点判定的立法缺失的基础上,引出我国实践中对中间争点的判定方式,揭示此种判定方式所导致的缺陷,并分析我国之所以缺失中间确认判决制度的成因。第三章:论证在我国民事诉讼确立民事中间确认判决制度的必要性。从中间争点的先决性规律、中间确认判决制度的特殊价值及其对审判方式改革的意义三个方面来阐述在我国确立中间确认判决制度的必要。第四章:对具体构建我国民事中间确认判决制度进行论述。本章从四个方面进行论述,首先对中间确认判决的对象进行定位,其次是民事中间确认判决的具体程序,接着再探讨中间确认判决的效力与救济,并提出与中间确认判决制度相关配套措施的立法完善建议。结语:概括本文的内容,并指出仍存在的不足之处。
[Abstract]:Intermediate confirmation judgment refers to the judgment made by the court on the dispute and fact of the existence or not of the prior legal relationship or the basic right of the litigant's claim before the final judgment is made in the process of civil action. The establishment of the intermediate confirmation judgment system aims to protect the litigant's right of action, improve the quality of the trial and promote the parties' consensual settlement of disputes. Unfortunately, the legislation of intermediate confirmation judgment in our country is still in a blank state, but in theory, although there are many studies on intermediate judgment, but there are very few in-depth studies on intermediate confirmation judgment. Even though some studies on intermediate judgment refer to intermediate confirmation judgment, it is limited to the brief introduction of the concept of intermediate confirmation judgment, so far, scholars have not paid enough attention to intermediate confirmation judgment. As a result, there are many problems in the judgment of the intermediate points in the current judicial practice of our country. The author aims to make a tentative demonstration of this blind spot of the study, proceed from analyzing the theoretical basis of the intermediate confirmation judgment system, compare and draw lessons from the relevant provisions of foreign countries, and put forward some legislative proposals for the construction of the intermediate confirmation judgment system in our country. In this way, the author tries to provide a good solution to the substantive disputes in civil litigation. This paper is divided into three parts: foreword, text and conclusion. The main contents of each part are as follows: preface: briefly discusses the system of intermediate confirmation judgment in civil litigation and the importance of setting up intermediate confirmation judgment in civil litigation in our country. Chapter one: analyze the basic theory of the system of intermediate confirmation, and investigate the relevant foreign legislation. The content involves the concept of intermediate confirmation judgment and its classification, nature, theoretical basis and the legislation of intermediate confirmation judgment in Germany, Japan and Taiwan. Chapter two: analyze the practice situation of our country in the absence of civil intermediate confirmation judgment system. On the basis of analyzing the lack of legislation on the judgment of intermediate dispute point in our country, this paper draws out the judgment method of intermediate dispute point in our country's practice, and reveals the defects caused by this kind of judgment method. And analyzes the reason why our country lacks the intermediate confirmation judgment system. Chapter three: to demonstrate the necessity of establishing the system of civil intermediate confirmation in civil litigation in China. This paper expounds the necessity of establishing the intermediate confirmation judgment system in our country from three aspects: the law of the pre-decision of the intermediate dispute point, the special value of the intermediate confirmation judgment system and its significance to the reform of the trial mode. Chapter IV: the concrete construction of civil confirmation judgment system in China. This chapter discusses from four aspects, first of all, positioning the object of intermediate confirmation judgment, secondly, the specific procedure of civil intermediate confirmation judgment, and then discussing the effectiveness and relief of intermediate confirmation judgment. And puts forward the legislation consummation suggestion of the supporting measures related to the intermediate confirmation judgment system. Conclusion: summarize the content of this paper, and point out the shortcomings.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】