我国行政诉讼立案登记制度研究

发布时间：2018-10-20 08:01

【摘要】：行政立案登记制度在2015年颁布的《行政诉讼法》中被首次确立,标志着我国行政诉讼立案制度进入全新的时代。2017年1月,在实践中创立辉煌成绩的立案登记制度,也同时出现了许多的问题。虽然登记制度大尺度地缓解了“立案难”问题,但制度本身以及实践中暴露的问题不容忽视:登记制度本身无明确的理论支撑,各人民法院对起诉条件的审查标准不一,实际操作模棱两可;法院贯策执行立案登记制度的同时缺乏监督机制,权力得不到监督;缺乏相应的制度与之相配套;当事人滥诉等等。因此在立法和司法实践过程中需要不断地完善行政立案登记制度,以期最大限度保护当事人诉权。论文由四个部分组成:第一章:行政诉讼立案登记制度概述。在明确制度相关概念之后,对立案登记制度在我国确立的背景进行简单介绍。对域外的立案制度进行学习,提出有益的借鉴点。最后提出支撑我国确立绝对立案登记制度的相关理论基础。第二章;构建行政诉讼立案登记制度的原因以及期望实现的目标。在对原有的制度进行剖析不足的基础上寻找问题所在,并对此改革后实现的目标进行梳理探讨。第三章:我国行政诉松立案登记制度之问题研究。通过数据搜集、文献参考等方式,汲取国内学者相关观点,分析行政诉讼立案登记制度存在的问题。第四章:我国行政诉讼立案登记制度之完善。针对本文第三章中提出的行政立案登记制度在立法和司法方面存在的缺陷,如立案缺乏监督等问题,分别提出一些改革建议。
[Abstract]:The administrative filing registration system was established for the first time in the Administrative Litigation Law promulgated in 2015, which marks the entry of a new era in China's administrative litigation filing system. In January 2017, the registration system with brilliant achievements was created in practice. At the same time, there are many problems. Although the registration system has alleviated the problem of "filing a case" on a large scale, the problems exposed in the system itself and in practice should not be ignored: the registration system itself has no clear theoretical support, and various people's courts have different standards for the examination of the conditions for prosecution. The actual operation is ambiguous; the court carries out the system of filing and registration at the same time the lack of supervision mechanism, the power can not be supervised; the lack of corresponding system to match it; the parties overappeal and so on. Therefore, in the process of legislation and judicial practice, it is necessary to continuously improve the administrative registration system in order to protect the litigants' right of action to the maximum extent. The thesis consists of four parts: chapter one: an overview of the registration system of administrative proceedings. After clarifying the relevant concepts of the system, the background of the establishment of the registration system in China is briefly introduced. To carry on the study to the extraterritorial filing system, put forward the beneficial reference point. Finally, it puts forward the relevant theoretical basis to support the establishment of absolute registration system in China. The second chapter: the reasons for the establishment of administrative litigation registration system and the desired objectives. On the basis of the analysis of the original system, the problem is found, and the goal after the reform is combed and discussed. Chapter three: research on the registration system of administrative litigation. Through data collection, literature reference and so on, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the registration system of administrative litigation by drawing on the relevant viewpoints of domestic scholars. Chapter four: the perfection of the registration system of administrative litigation in our country. In view of the defects of the administrative registration system in the third chapter, such as the lack of supervision, some reform suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】