当事人对移送管辖裁定的救济

发布时间：2018-10-22 09:55

【摘要】：我国法院作出的移送管辖裁定有两种类型:一种是法院依职权主动作出的裁定,另一种是法院审查当事人管辖权异议认为当事人主张成立时被动作出的裁定。我国法规范尚未明确规定当事人对移送管辖裁定的救济路径,为更好实现当事人诉讼权利与法院审判权力之间的均衡配置,有必要探讨此问题。当事人对移送管辖裁定的救济路径依赖于移送管辖裁定的具体类型:在第一种类型下,因法院所作裁定并无当事人关于管辖权之意思介入,故此时应赋予当事人救济权,当事人有权向受移送法院而非移送法院提出管辖权异议,但不能直接就法院裁定提起上诉;在第二种类型下,根据民事诉讼一事不再理原则,提出管辖权异议或者移送管辖申请之当事人的对方当事人对移送管辖裁定不享有上诉权。
[Abstract]:There are two types of decisions on transfer to jurisdiction made by Chinese courts: one is the decision made by the court on its own initiative, the other is the ruling made passively when the court reviews the parties' jurisdictional objection that the parties claim to be established. The legal norm of our country has not clearly stipulated the relief path of the parties to the transfer jurisdiction and adjudication. In order to realize the balance between the litigant's litigation rights and the court's trial power, it is necessary to probe into this problem. The relief path of the parties to the order of transfer jurisdiction depends on the specific types of the order of transfer jurisdiction: in the first type, since the ruling made by the court does not involve the parties about jurisdiction, the right of relief should be given to the parties. The parties have the right to challenge their jurisdiction to the court to which they are transferred rather than to the court, but cannot appeal directly against the decision of the court; in the second type, under the principle of non bis in idem of civil action, The other party that raises the jurisdiction objection or transfers the jurisdiction application does not have the right of appeal against the transfer jurisdiction ruling.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会部级重点课题“我国民事诉讼简易程序实证研究”(项目编号:CLS(2015)ZDWT55) “山东大学青年学者未来计划资助”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】