民诉法修订背景下对“诉调对接”机制的思考

发布时间：2018-10-22 11:54

【摘要】：《民事诉讼法》(2012年修正)在确立"先行调解"和审前"分流式"调解的同时,对司法确认制度给予了法典化确立,从而为"诉调对接"机制的进一步发展和完善注入了新活力、提出了新挑战。通过对新旧规范的系统梳理及司法实证数据的收集分析,可以揭示三大"诉调对接"机制在理论、制度和实践中所存在的问题与困惑。为实现司法与诉外解纷机制之间的实质化协作,应当厘清调解协议与原纠纷之间的关系,矫正对司法确认制度的过分期望,合理配置各类司法调解与诉讼裁判制度之间的分工模式,进而扭转和避免调解与司法混同化、虚假调解泛滥、解纷矛盾后移、执行压力"旋转门"等消极局面的出现。
[Abstract]:The Civil procedure Law (amended in 2012) not only establishes "mediation first" and "diversion mediation" before trial, but also codifies the system of judicial confirmation, thus infusing new vitality into the further development and perfection of the mechanism of "suit and docking". New challenges are presented. Through the systematic analysis of the new and old norms and the collection and analysis of the judicial empirical data, the problems and puzzles existing in the theory, system and practice of the three major mechanisms of "litigation and adjustment" can be revealed. In order to realize the substantial cooperation between the judicial and the extrinsic dispute resolution mechanism, we should clarify the relationship between the mediation agreement and the original dispute, and correct the excessive expectation for the judicial confirmation system. Rational allocation of the division of labor between various judicial mediation and litigation adjudication system, thus reversing and avoiding the emergence of negative situations such as mediation and judicial confusion, the proliferation of false mediation, the backward movement of resolving conflicts, and the "revolving door" of executive pressure.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2012年度部级重点课题“民事诉讼程序协调机制研究”(〈LSC2012〉B23)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【共引文献】