行政诉讼第三人权益保护问题研究
[Abstract]:The third party system of administrative litigation in our country starts late, the theoretical research is not perfect, and there is a lot of blank in legislation. In recent years, with the rapid development of our economy and the development of the concept of rule of law, the situation involving the third party in the administrative proceedings is increasing day by day, and the difficulty of the case adjudication is gradually increasing. Accordingly, the provisions of the current law concerning the third party in administrative proceedings expose serious legislative defects. Because the people's court is overstretched in the application of the law, the judge often enjoys greater discretion in the case involving the third party in the administrative litigation. This is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the third party in the administrative proceedings, nor to the smooth conduct of the judicial work. It has even affected the establishment of judicial authority in the people's courts. The new Administrative Litigation Law, which was implemented in 2015, has perfected the third party system, but there are still many legislative gaps, which make it difficult to solve many legal problems in judicial practice. The introduction of the latest judicial interpretation does not pay attention to the third party, so it is necessary to perfect the third party system in administrative litigation. In this paper, the analysis of the elements and comparative analysis of the research methods, first of all, the new law for the third party in administrative proceedings legislative analysis, The third party system under the legislative background of the new administrative procedure law is pointed out. Secondly, through the induction and deduction of the existing academic achievements of the third party in administrative litigation, the author analyzes the constitutive elements of interest, which consists of the elements of interest and causality. With the deepening of the theory, the judgment method of the definition of interests is obtained, through which the qualification of the third party in the administrative litigation can be determined. Finally, combining with the theory of our country, the concrete situation of the third party in the administrative litigation in practice, On the basis of the classification of the third party in administrative litigation, the characteristics and litigation rights of the third party of each type are expounded in detail.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D925.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周郁昌;行政诉讼第三人辨析[J];政法论丛;2001年04期
2 余冠鹏;行政诉讼第三人原理探究[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2004年03期
3 杨海坤,马生安;中外行政诉讼第三人制度比较研究[J];比较法研究;2004年03期
4 李全庆;行政诉讼第三人的界定[J];徐州教育学院学报;2004年02期
5 向忠诚;行政诉讼第三人制度研究[J];时代法学;2004年05期
6 杨炼;行政诉讼第三人范围之界定[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
7 吴晓华,张海燕;行政诉讼第三人类型化研究[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2005年01期
8 李慧鹏;田茹;;行政诉讼第三人初探[J];河北广播电视大学学报;2006年05期
9 井凯笛;;试论行政诉讼第三人[J];法制与社会;2006年18期
10 罗其军;;行政诉讼第三人[J];法制与社会;2007年07期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 周郁昌;;行政诉讼第三人辨析[A];重庆工程图学学会第十四届图学研讨会交流暨第二届CAD应用、CAI软件演示交流大会论文集[C];2004年
2 郝静;;行政诉讼第三人研究——以行政机关为研究角度[A];当代法学论坛(2007年第1辑)[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 王雯;行政诉讼第三人范围的界定[N];江苏经济报;2014年
2 郭庆珠;析行政诉讼第三人制度的完善[N];人民法院报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈岩;行政诉讼第三人资格研究[D];电子科技大学;2008年
2 胡哲;论行政诉讼第三人制度的完善[D];吉林大学;2008年
3 黄明华;行政诉讼第三人制度对民事诉讼第三人制度的准用[D];厦门大学;2008年
4 刘思琪;行政诉讼第三人立法研究[D];湖南大学;2009年
5 齐丹;论行政诉讼第三人[D];长春理工大学;2009年
6 唐琦;行政诉讼第三人研究[D];山东大学;2009年
7 朱华丽;我国行政诉讼第三人制度探究[D];河南大学;2010年
8 马丽芬;拆迁行政诉讼第三人制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
9 张弘;行政诉讼第三人制度新探[D];西南政法大学;2010年
10 田翠兰;行政诉讼第三人制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
,本文编号:2292076
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2292076.html