以小见大:我国小额诉讼立法之透析
发布时间：2018-11-04 16:57
【摘要】：我国民事诉讼法修正案确立的小额诉讼的"二元标准",决定了"对简单的小额案件适用简易程序并一审终审,对非简单的小额案件适用普通程序并两审终审"的"双轨机制"的必然采用。这既对民事诉讼当事人权利平等原则提出了挑战,也大为抑制了设置小额诉讼机制的目标和意义,难以有效解决由于我国第一审程序区分性能薄弱而导致的诉讼拥堵和司法效率低下、品质低劣的状况。因此,我国民事诉讼法应建构与纠纷自身及解纷诉求更具匹配性的司法替代性解纷机制,以真正体现其人性关怀和程序理性。
[Abstract]:The "dual standard" of small amount litigation established by the amendment to the Civil procedure Law of our country decides that "the summary procedure shall be applied to simple small cases and the final instance shall be made at first instance." The dual-track mechanism of applying ordinary procedure and two-instance final appeal to non-simple small cases is inevitable. This not only challenges the principle of equal rights of the parties in civil proceedings, but also greatly suppresses the goal and significance of setting up the mechanism of small claims. It is difficult to solve the problem of litigation congestion, low judicial efficiency and poor quality due to the weak performance of the first instance procedure in our country. Therefore, the civil procedure law of our country should construct the judicial alternative dispute resolution mechanism which is more compatible with the dispute itself and the demand for resolving the dispute, so as to truly embody its humanity concern and procedural rationality.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1
[Abstract]:The "dual standard" of small amount litigation established by the amendment to the Civil procedure Law of our country decides that "the summary procedure shall be applied to simple small cases and the final instance shall be made at first instance." The dual-track mechanism of applying ordinary procedure and two-instance final appeal to non-simple small cases is inevitable. This not only challenges the principle of equal rights of the parties in civil proceedings, but also greatly suppresses the goal and significance of setting up the mechanism of small claims. It is difficult to solve the problem of litigation congestion, low judicial efficiency and poor quality due to the weak performance of the first instance procedure in our country. Therefore, the civil procedure law of our country should construct the judicial alternative dispute resolution mechanism which is more compatible with the dispute itself and the demand for resolving the dispute, so as to truly embody its humanity concern and procedural rationality.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戴莉;;关于建立我国小额诉讼程序的设想[J];才智;2008年08期
2 牛玉洲;王晓利;;小额诉讼程序的若干问题[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年12期
3 吴金凤;简易程序:法理、问题与立法完善之探析——兼论对小额诉讼程序的质疑[J];当代法学;2002年08期
4 曹德仁;我国民事诉讼简易程序的完善[J];当代法学;2003年03期
5 吕兴勇,苗波;民事简易程序之完善[J];山东审判;2002年04期
6 何文燕,廖永安;我国民事简易诉讼程序之重构[J];中国法学;2002年01期
7 叶永禄,彭大银,钱美敏;论完善民事诉讼简易程序[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年03期
8 黄良军;民事简易程序改革的若干问题探析[J];山东社会科学;2004年10期
9 孙薇;李轲;;民事简易程序现状分析及改革构想[J];黄河科技大学学报;2006年01期
10 陈勇;;我国民事简易程序刍议[J];福州党校学报;2007年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 归东;何建军;;适用简易程序审理案件存在的问题及对策[A];第三届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2001年
2 归东;何建军;;适用简易程序审理案件存在的问题及对策[A];贵州法学论坛第三届文集[C];2001年
3 熊文钊;吴e，
本文编号：2310530
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2310530.html
