人权视野下刑讯逼供多元制衡机制研究
发布时间：2018-11-10 23:14
【摘要】：侵犯人权的刑讯逼供行为,损害的是人的尊严和价值,毁坏的是整个社会的人权理念和道德原则。其存在的深层次原因是"重打击犯罪、轻人权保障"的传统思想。我国宪法与刑事诉讼法先后将"尊重与保障人权"载入其中,具有重大的宪政意义和诉讼实践意义。在各级侦查机关的正式文书和对外宣传口径中,刑讯逼供也遭到明确而坚决的反对。然而,在司法实践中的刑讯逼供却依然保持着旺盛的生命力。从立法宗旨和司法意图上看,能否对刑讯逼供严防规制,是考察一个国家刑事司法技术的一个重要指标,同时也是评估刑事司法制度优劣的一个不容忽视的问题。
[Abstract]:Extorting confessions by torture infringes human rights, harms human dignity and value, and destroys the human rights concept and moral principles of the whole society. The deep reason of its existence is the traditional thought of "paying more attention to the fight against crime than to the protection of human rights". Our constitution and criminal procedure law have included "respecting and protecting human rights", which has great constitutional significance and practical significance of litigation. In the official documents and propaganda of investigation organs at all levels, extortion of confessions by torture has also been clearly and resolutely opposed. However, in judicial practice, extorting confessions by torture still maintains a vigorous vitality. From the point of view of legislative purpose and judicial intention, it is an important index to investigate the criminal justice technology of a country, and it is also a problem that can not be ignored to evaluate the merits and demerits of criminal justice system.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2323843
[Abstract]:Extorting confessions by torture infringes human rights, harms human dignity and value, and destroys the human rights concept and moral principles of the whole society. The deep reason of its existence is the traditional thought of "paying more attention to the fight against crime than to the protection of human rights". Our constitution and criminal procedure law have included "respecting and protecting human rights", which has great constitutional significance and practical significance of litigation. In the official documents and propaganda of investigation organs at all levels, extortion of confessions by torture has also been clearly and resolutely opposed. However, in judicial practice, extorting confessions by torture still maintains a vigorous vitality. From the point of view of legislative purpose and judicial intention, it is an important index to investigate the criminal justice technology of a country, and it is also a problem that can not be ignored to evaluate the merits and demerits of criminal justice system.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 贺毓;;刑事司法赢得公众信任研究[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年02期
2 叶宁;左勇;;犯罪打击与权利保障的双重悖反——刑事推定现状的反思[J];法制与社会;2012年28期
3 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2323843
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2323843.html
