第二审程序的反诉:制度建构与理念变迁——兼评《民诉法解释》第328条

发布时间：2018-11-11 14:47

【摘要】：第二审程序的反诉为相对独立之诉,程序选择权与纠纷解决一次性两种理论为其提供了坚实的正当性基础。《民诉法解释》第328条是第二审程序的反诉在我国的客观实在法依托。然而,该条所做的程序安排交织存在着利益失衡、程序断裂与规范错位三大重要问题,严重抑制了第二审程序的反诉的理论认同与实践利用。在建构有序化与弹性化的第二审程序的反诉的过程中,合理的思路是适度糅合当事人合意机制与法院阐明权以实现二者之间的共同生长。这样,合作理念将适当注入现代民事诉讼之中,进而将深刻改变民事诉讼格局及其未来发展路向。
[Abstract]:The counterclaim of the second instance proceedings shall be a relatively independent action, The two theories of procedural option and dispute resolution provide a solid basis for its legitimacy. Article 328 of the Civil procedure Law is the basis of the counterclaim of the second instance procedure in our country. However, the procedure arrangement intertwined in this article has three important problems, such as the imbalance of interests, the procedural breakage and the dislocation of norms, which seriously inhibit the theoretical identification and practical utilization of the counterclaim of the second instance procedure. In the process of constructing an orderly and flexible counterclaim of the second instance procedure, the reasonable way of thinking is to combine the consensual mechanism of the parties with the power of clarification of the court in order to realize the common growth between the two. In this way, the concept of cooperation will be properly injected into modern civil litigation, and then will profoundly change the pattern of civil litigation and its future development.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学法学院;
【基金】：2014年浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“民事诉讼结构的嬗变与诉讼合作主义的生成”(14NDJC136YB) 2015年杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题“环境公益诉讼权利生成效能的实现路径与程序安排研究”(Z15JC124) 2016年浙江工商大学法学基地课题“环境公益诉讼权利生成效能的实现路径与程序安排研究”(2016B008)
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】