沈阳公安机关刑事强制措施的适用与改进研究
发布时间：2018-11-23 11:46
【摘要】：刑事强制措施是国家为了实现诉讼目的,保障刑事诉讼顺利进行而暂时性地剥夺或者限制犯罪嫌疑人、被告人基本权利的行为,是追诉犯罪、保证国家司法审判程序有效进行的重要措施,在现代刑事诉讼中具有不可替代的重要作用。从世界发展的历程来看,刑事强制措施适用体系的构建应该以公民基本权利为理论基础,自此层面之上,使得以国家强制力为后盾的国家强制措施在操作程序和方式方法上受到国家刑事政策的控制和制约,公民的权利能得到法律的救济,避免因权力的滥用而导致的公民基本权利被肆意的侵犯。2004年我国将“国家尊重和保障人权”写入处于根本大法地位的宪法文本中,这是一种高层次的宣示,一种负责任形象的展现,自此,我国跨入了一个人权保护的新时代。2012年新的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》施行以后,对刑事强制措施的使用程序和标准做了更加详细的规定,这是一种立法的进步和顺应社会实践的改革,也标志着我国的刑事强制措施的适用工作进入了一个全新的时代。然而,对于刑事强制措施适用工作而言,在司法实践中仍还有很多问题在这次修改中没有得到解决。本文通过对沈阳市公安局刑事强制措施适用现状进行调查研究后认为,沈阳市各级公安机关在刑事强制措施的适用方面仅仅依据相关法律去执行,缺乏一个规范的适用制度和适用体系,亟需一种科学的适用方式。 本文在实地调查研究的基础上,从沈阳市公安系统机关刑事强制措施适用的现状入手,探究了沈阳市公安局刑事强制措施的适用工作中存在的问题,并针对这些问题分析了其成因；把刑事强制措施适用工作的改进作为本论文的研究目标,借鉴美国、英国等发达国家刑事强制措施适用工作的先进经验,提出改进方案,并对该方案的可行性和有效性进行了论证,进而从提高公安机关执法人员素质、加强刑事强制措施适用程序管理以及完善刑事强制措施适用的评估机制等方面,提出沈阳市公安机关刑事强制措施适用的具体改进对策。
[Abstract]:Criminal coercive measures are acts of the state to temporarily deprive or restrict the basic rights of criminal suspects and defendants in order to achieve the purpose of litigation and to ensure the smooth progress of criminal proceedings. The important measures to ensure the effective conduct of the national judicial procedure play an irreplaceable role in the modern criminal procedure. Judging from the course of world development, the construction of the applicable system of criminal coercive measures should be based on the basic rights of citizens. So that the state coercive measures backed by national coercive force are controlled and restricted by the state criminal policy in terms of operating procedures and methods, and the rights of citizens can be remedied by law. To avoid arbitrary violations of the fundamental rights of citizens resulting from the abuse of power. In 2004, our country included "the State respects and guarantees human rights" in the constitutional text, which is in the fundamental position of the Great Law. This is a high-level declaration, Since then, China has entered a new era of human rights protection. After the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2012, The procedure and standard of criminal coercive measures are stipulated in more detail, which is a kind of legislative progress and the reform of social practice. It also marks that the application of criminal coercive measures in our country has entered a new era. However, for the application of criminal coercive measures, there are still many problems in judicial practice that have not been solved in this revision. Based on the investigation and research on the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security Bureau, this paper holds that the public security organs at all levels in Shenyang only carry out the application of criminal coercive measures in accordance with relevant laws. Lack of a standard applicable system and application system, need a scientific way of application. On the basis of field investigation and research, starting with the current situation of the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security system, this paper probes into the problems existing in the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security Bureau. The causes of these problems are analyzed. Taking the improvement of the application of criminal coercive measures as the research goal of this paper, drawing lessons from the advanced experience of the application of criminal coercive measures in developed countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the author puts forward the improvement scheme. The feasibility and effectiveness of the scheme are demonstrated, and then, from the aspects of improving the quality of law enforcement personnel in public security organs, strengthening the management of the applicable procedures of criminal coercive measures and perfecting the evaluation mechanism for the application of criminal coercive measures, etc. This paper puts forward the concrete improvement countermeasures for the application of criminal coercive measures of public security organs in Shenyang.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2351491
[Abstract]:Criminal coercive measures are acts of the state to temporarily deprive or restrict the basic rights of criminal suspects and defendants in order to achieve the purpose of litigation and to ensure the smooth progress of criminal proceedings. The important measures to ensure the effective conduct of the national judicial procedure play an irreplaceable role in the modern criminal procedure. Judging from the course of world development, the construction of the applicable system of criminal coercive measures should be based on the basic rights of citizens. So that the state coercive measures backed by national coercive force are controlled and restricted by the state criminal policy in terms of operating procedures and methods, and the rights of citizens can be remedied by law. To avoid arbitrary violations of the fundamental rights of citizens resulting from the abuse of power. In 2004, our country included "the State respects and guarantees human rights" in the constitutional text, which is in the fundamental position of the Great Law. This is a high-level declaration, Since then, China has entered a new era of human rights protection. After the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2012, The procedure and standard of criminal coercive measures are stipulated in more detail, which is a kind of legislative progress and the reform of social practice. It also marks that the application of criminal coercive measures in our country has entered a new era. However, for the application of criminal coercive measures, there are still many problems in judicial practice that have not been solved in this revision. Based on the investigation and research on the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security Bureau, this paper holds that the public security organs at all levels in Shenyang only carry out the application of criminal coercive measures in accordance with relevant laws. Lack of a standard applicable system and application system, need a scientific way of application. On the basis of field investigation and research, starting with the current situation of the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security system, this paper probes into the problems existing in the application of criminal coercive measures in Shenyang Public Security Bureau. The causes of these problems are analyzed. Taking the improvement of the application of criminal coercive measures as the research goal of this paper, drawing lessons from the advanced experience of the application of criminal coercive measures in developed countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the author puts forward the improvement scheme. The feasibility and effectiveness of the scheme are demonstrated, and then, from the aspects of improving the quality of law enforcement personnel in public security organs, strengthening the management of the applicable procedures of criminal coercive measures and perfecting the evaluation mechanism for the application of criminal coercive measures, etc. This paper puts forward the concrete improvement countermeasures for the application of criminal coercive measures of public security organs in Shenyang.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王舒娜;从公共管理的视角看公安管理的基本内涵[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2004年01期
2 江苏省司法厅课题组;缪蒂生;;司法行政加强社会管理创新的实践与思考[J];中国司法;2012年01期
3 张永强;;进一步提高公安机关执法水平和执法质量的思考[J];公安研究;2007年03期
4 李超;;浅谈刑事强制措施的适用[J];法制与经济(下旬);2013年07期
5 孙长永;比较法视野中的刑事强制措施[J];法学研究;2005年01期
6 吴畅;;论刑事强制措施中人权保障的不足与完善[J];警官文苑;2013年01期
7 洪领先;;论刑事强制措施诉讼监督体系与机制构建[J];中国检察官;2013年13期
8 孙伟年;;关于警务管理创新理念的若干思考[J];北京警察学院学报;2013年02期
9 汪建成,冀祥德;我国未决羁押制度的批判性重构[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2004年01期
10 崔晓娟;;中日刑事强制措施制度之比较[J];西安文理学院学报(社会科学版);2005年06期
，本文编号：2351491
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2351491.html
