专家辅助人制度:面临问题与完善路径
发布时间：2018-11-25 08:31
【摘要】：新《刑事诉讼法》第192条增加了"有专门知识的人"参与刑事诉讼的条款,这意味着我国刑事诉讼中确立了专家辅助人制度。专家辅助人出庭对法官采信鉴定意见具有一定的作用,但实践中也面临一些突出问题:专家辅助人的资格条件不明,专家辅助人的对抗手段有限,专家辅助人出庭的交叉询问不充分等。完善专家辅助人制度应合理界定专家辅助人的资格,明确专家辅助人的诉讼地位,明确专家辅助人的意见属性,解决专家辅助人及技术服务机构的管理问题。
[Abstract]:Article 192 of the new Code of Criminal procedure adds the clause that "the person with special knowledge" participates in the criminal procedure, which means that the expert assistant system has been established in the criminal procedure in our country. The appearance of expert auxiliaries has a certain effect on the judge's acceptance and appraisal opinion, but in practice there are some outstanding problems: the qualification condition of expert assistant is not clear, and the confrontation means of expert assistant are limited. The cross-examination of expert auxiliaries in court is not sufficient, etc. In order to perfect the system of expert assistant, the qualification of expert assistant should be reasonably defined, the litigation status of expert assistant should be clarified, the opinion attribute of expert assistant should be clear, and the management problems of expert assistant and technical service organization should be solved.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“医疗损害鉴定不信任问题实证研究”(14SFB30019) 2013年度华东政法大学科学研究项目“科学证据采信规则研究”(A-3101-14-144512) 中国博士后第八批特别资助(2015T80420),负责人陈邦达
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:Article 192 of the new Code of Criminal procedure adds the clause that "the person with special knowledge" participates in the criminal procedure, which means that the expert assistant system has been established in the criminal procedure in our country. The appearance of expert auxiliaries has a certain effect on the judge's acceptance and appraisal opinion, but in practice there are some outstanding problems: the qualification condition of expert assistant is not clear, and the confrontation means of expert assistant are limited. The cross-examination of expert auxiliaries in court is not sufficient, etc. In order to perfect the system of expert assistant, the qualification of expert assistant should be reasonably defined, the litigation status of expert assistant should be clarified, the opinion attribute of expert assistant should be clear, and the management problems of expert assistant and technical service organization should be solved.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“医疗损害鉴定不信任问题实证研究”(14SFB30019) 2013年度华东政法大学科学研究项目“科学证据采信规则研究”(A-3101-14-144512) 中国博士后第八批特别资助(2015T80420),负责人陈邦达
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵杰;;论专家辅助人出庭质证制度[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 林钰;;专家辅助人出庭制度研究[J];法制博览;2015年23期
2 刘畅;刘宇;;论新《刑事诉讼法》中的专家出庭制度[J];学理论;2014年13期
3 方姚;沙万中;;论笔迹类专家辅助人出庭质证[J];甘肃警察职业学院学报;2014年03期
4 刘畅;刘宇;;新《刑事诉讼法》中专家出庭制度的若干问题探讨[J];中国市场;2014年21期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 范晓娜;知识产权诉讼中的专家辅助人制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2014年
2 刘晨;论刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度[D];华东政法大学;2014年
3 高秋颖;论专家辅助意见之证据效力[D];西南政法大学;2015年
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘宁;商辅助人探析[J];吕梁高等专科学校学报;2004年03期
2 莫于川;;从专家辅助人制度看司法潮流[J];人民检察;2006年21期
3 张善q，
本文编号：2355454
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2355454.html
