刑事第二审改判制度研究
[Abstract]:As the final procedure of the trial, the criminal second instance procedure has become an indispensable part of the two-instance final procedure in our country. It has become a powerful measure to supervise the first instance procedure, and has provided an effective remedy for the parties concerned. Through the procedure of second instance, the people's court corrects the judgment which has not yet had legal effect in part of the first instance according to law, the purpose of which is to correct the wrong judgment of the first instance and to ensure the fairness and justice of the judgment. However, some members of the public have misinterpreted the second instance court's revision as a "wrong case" at first instance. Whether the public can correctly understand the legal significance of the revision is related to the judicial authority and the image of the court, and whether the first-instance decision can win the public's trust. The way to deal with the judgment of the first instance in the second instance of criminal trial is to maintain the original judgment, to change the sentence directly, to send it back to trial, and to revise the sentence is the embodiment of the independence of the trial and the discretion of the judge. This paper first introduces the concept and characteristics of criminal second instance revision, analyzes its legal significance, secondly, studies the treatment of foreign criminal second instance, expounds the theoretical basis of criminal second instance revision and the advantages of foreign revision. Third, analyzes the present situation and existing problems of the second criminal trial revision in our country, and points out the mechanism that our country obstructs the criminal second instance revision; fourth, expounds the public's concept of the criminal second instance revision in our country, and explains the reason why the revision is a normal judicial phenomenon. Fifthly, according to the problems existing in the revision of the second criminal trial in our country, some suggestions are put forward in order to perfect the system of the revision of the second instance in our country, eliminate the misunderstanding of the public, correctly understand the legal significance of the revision of the second instance, and then return the judge of first instance to "innocence".
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯学勇;;司法修辞方法在社会正义实现中的作用[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年01期
2 王超;;刑事二审发回重审制度的功能异化:从救济到惩罚[J];政治与法律;2011年11期
3 邢冰;;量刑规范化改革对二审刑期改判影响之实证分析[J];法学论坛;2011年04期
4 中国刑事二审程序改革与完善课题组;封利强;;关于我国刑事二审程序运行情况的调研报告[J];刑事司法论坛;2010年00期
5 张小虎;;我国死刑裁量的法理分析——孙伟铭死刑案二审改判的具体展开[J];社会科学研究;2010年01期
6 王冬云;陈增宝;;理性地对待刑事二审改判——对现行错案追究制的反思[J];法治研究;2009年12期
7 张健英;;关于刑事二审几个问题的探讨[J];中共乐山市委党校学报;2009年05期
8 林孝文;;法官自由裁量权的法社会学分析[J];社会科学家;2009年06期
9 易延友;;我国刑事审级制度的建构与反思[J];法学研究;2009年03期
10 刘根菊;封利强;;论刑事第二审程序的审判范围——以程序功能为视角[J];时代法学;2008年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 吴建雄;中国二元司法模式研究[D];中南大学;2012年
2 尹丽华;刑事上诉制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 赵瑞敏;对刑事二审发回重审的反思[D];中国政法大学;2011年
2 马云雪;论刑事诉讼二审发回重审制度[D];广西民族大学;2010年
3 崔巍;死刑二审审理方式改革研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
4 董昆;刑事二审抗诉的现状与反思[D];西南政法大学;2009年
5 张斌;二审因一审程序违法发回重审研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
6 李良富;刑事审级制度研究[D];湘潭大学;2003年
本文编号:2369874
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2369874.html