捕后羁押必要性审查制度比较研究

发布时间：2018-12-16 00:09

【摘要】：捕后羁押必要性审查是通过对犯罪嫌疑人逮捕羁押后的合法性和必要性进行动态审查和随时纠偏的一项制度,可以防止国家公权力对犯罪嫌疑人合法权利的过度侵害,并且对司法实践中存在的超期羁押问题起到很好的限制作用。在域外法治国家立法当中,羁押必要性审查制度早已确立和运行许久,而在我国2012年新修订的刑事诉讼法中刚刚确立下来,并且立法规定还不够完善。本文试图在借鉴域外国家羁押必要性审查制度立法经验的基础上,结合我国的立法与司法现状,有针对性的提出我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度存在的问题,同时,对存在的问题提出一些合理性的建议。为此,本文总分三个部分对捕后羁押必要性审查制度的相关问题进行探究。第一部分主要介绍捕后羁押必要性审查制度基本概述。其中主要包含该制度的概念、特征、性质界定、理论基础和确立该制度对解决我国司法实践中存在的问题的现实意义。然后详细阐述有关我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度的立法规定,并且分析该制度确立以后在各地的运行状况,推出我国捕后羁押必要性审查机制在立法和司法实践层面上存在的问题。第二部分是域外法治国家羁押必要性审查制度的比较考察。通过介绍域外国家有关该制度在审查主体、审查程序、羁押期限和救济途径四个方面的立法规定,立足我国国情,借鉴其中适合我国的经验,以期达到完善我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度的目的。第三部分是完善我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度的具体对策。针对我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度在运行中存在的问题,在借鉴域外国家立法经验的基础上,提出有针对性和合理性的完善建议。主要在明确我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度审查主体、审查的范围和重点、增强检察建议的执行力、完善羁押必要性审查的救济途径和相关的配套机制等方面提出建议。
[Abstract]:The examination of the necessity of custody after arrest is a system of dynamic examination and correction of the legality and necessity of the arrest and detention of criminal suspects, which can prevent excessive infringement of the legal rights of criminal suspects by the public power of the state. And the problem of extended detention in judicial practice plays a good role in limiting. In the national legislation of the extraterritorial rule of law, the review system of the necessity of custody has been established and operated for a long time, but it has just been established in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of our country in 2012, and the legislative provisions are not perfect enough. On the basis of drawing lessons from the legislative experience of the necessity review system of custody in foreign countries and combining the current legislative and judicial situation of our country, this paper tries to point out the problems existing in the review system of the necessity of detaining custody after arrest in our country, and at the same time, Put forward some reasonable suggestions to the existing problems. Therefore, this article is divided into three parts to explore the necessity of post-arrest detention review system. The first part mainly introduces the review system of the necessity of detention after arrest. It mainly includes the concept, characteristics, nature definition, theoretical basis and the practical significance of establishing the system to solve the problems existing in the judicial practice of our country. Then it elaborates on the legislative provisions of the necessity examination system of detention after arrest in China, and analyzes the operation of the system in various places after the establishment of the system. The necessity examination mechanism of detention after arrest is put forward in the aspects of legislation and judicial practice. The second part is a comparative study of the system of examining the necessity of custody in countries with the rule of law. By introducing the legislative provisions of the foreign countries on the subject of examination, the procedure of examination, the duration of detention and the way of relief, we should base ourselves on the national conditions of our country and draw lessons from the experience suitable for our country. In order to improve the necessity of detention after arrest review system. The third part is to perfect our country after arrest detention necessity examination system concrete countermeasure. In view of the problems existing in the system of examining the necessity of detention after arrest in our country, and on the basis of drawing lessons from the legislative experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the system. Some suggestions are put forward in the following aspects: the main body, the scope and emphasis of the examination, the enforcement of procuratorial suggestions, the improvement of the relief ways and relevant supporting mechanisms of the review of the necessity of custody in China.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】