论我国辩护律师调查取证制度
发布时间：2019-03-22 12:15
【摘要】：辩护律师的调查取证制度是刑事诉讼公平正义的重要保障,也是被追诉人辩护权得以实现的关键。它是对无罪推定原则、控辩平衡原理、程序正义理论以及有效辩论理论的践行,其在维护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的诉讼权益方面有着深刻的意义。虽在2012年,刑事诉讼法对该制度进行了一定程度上的修改,但是,现有的规定仍然存在一些缺陷,具体问题表现在如下几个方面：调查取证方式得以实现的法律保障不健全；辩护律师申请调查取证被申请人范围的局限性；辩护律师自身面临一定的法律风险等,这都是现存辩护律师调查取证制度的弊端。通过对域外国家的立法考察,发现域外国家在辩护律师调查取证制度的具体构建上有着诸多值得借鉴之处,在完善我国辩护律师调查制度时,在符合我国语境的前提下,可以适当借鉴先进立法经验。最后,在该制度完善的具体设想上,笔者认为,首先,我国应当设立调查令制度,确立刑事调查令申请与审批程序。其次,应当明确辩护律师在侦查阶段的调查取证权。最后,应当确立刑事辩护豁免制度。
[Abstract]:The investigation and evidence collection system of defense counsel is the important guarantee of fairness and justice in criminal procedure, and also the key to the realization of the right of defense of the accused. It is the practice of the principle of presumption of innocence, the principle of balance between prosecution and defense, the theory of procedural justice and the theory of effective debate. It has profound significance in safeguarding the rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants in litigation. Although in 2012, the criminal procedure law has modified the system to a certain extent, there are still some shortcomings in the existing regulations, which are reflected in the following aspects: the legal safeguards to be realized in the way of investigation and evidence collection are not sound; The limitation of defense lawyer's application for investigating and obtaining evidence, the limitation of defense lawyer's own legal risk and so on, are the disadvantages of the existing defense counsel's investigation and evidence collection system. Through the legislative investigation of the extraterritorial countries, it is found that the extraterritorial countries have a lot to learn from in the concrete construction of the defense counsel investigation and evidence collection system, while perfecting the defense counsel investigation system in our country, under the premise of accord with the context of our country, The advanced legislative experience can be used for reference. Finally, on the concrete assumption of perfecting the system, the author thinks that, firstly, our country should set up the investigation order system and establish the procedure of application and examination and approval of the criminal investigation order. Secondly, we should make clear the defense lawyer's right to investigate and collect evidence in the investigation stage. Finally, the system of immunity from criminal defence should be established.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2445581
[Abstract]:The investigation and evidence collection system of defense counsel is the important guarantee of fairness and justice in criminal procedure, and also the key to the realization of the right of defense of the accused. It is the practice of the principle of presumption of innocence, the principle of balance between prosecution and defense, the theory of procedural justice and the theory of effective debate. It has profound significance in safeguarding the rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants in litigation. Although in 2012, the criminal procedure law has modified the system to a certain extent, there are still some shortcomings in the existing regulations, which are reflected in the following aspects: the legal safeguards to be realized in the way of investigation and evidence collection are not sound; The limitation of defense lawyer's application for investigating and obtaining evidence, the limitation of defense lawyer's own legal risk and so on, are the disadvantages of the existing defense counsel's investigation and evidence collection system. Through the legislative investigation of the extraterritorial countries, it is found that the extraterritorial countries have a lot to learn from in the concrete construction of the defense counsel investigation and evidence collection system, while perfecting the defense counsel investigation system in our country, under the premise of accord with the context of our country, The advanced legislative experience can be used for reference. Finally, on the concrete assumption of perfecting the system, the author thinks that, firstly, our country should set up the investigation order system and establish the procedure of application and examination and approval of the criminal investigation order. Secondly, we should make clear the defense lawyer's right to investigate and collect evidence in the investigation stage. Finally, the system of immunity from criminal defence should be established.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王令;关于设立“律师执业案件追诉立案听证审查程序”的立法建议[J];中国司法;2000年06期
2 刘淑君;;刑事辩护律师调查取证权的宪法分析[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2012年06期
3 包献荣;;律师调查取证权研究——以新《刑事诉讼法》为视角[J];法制与社会;2012年36期
4 金佳英;;侦查阶段律师调查证权问题研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年08期
5 周冬雪;;论刑事诉讼辩护律师的调查取证权[J];才智;2014年14期
6 王楷;;律师调查取证权的定性与保障[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年02期
7 薛向楠;;侦查阶段律师调查取证权研究[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2012年03期
8 甄贞;郑瑞平;;论辩护律师申请调查取证权的实现[J];河南社会科学;2013年11期
9 王宇;;逮捕阶段控辩结构均衡化保障机制探究——以逮捕阶段律师辩护权保障为视角[J];中国检察官;2014年03期
10 褚宁;;构建侦查阶段辩护律师调查取证权的建议[J];河南社会科学;2014年03期
，本文编号：2445581
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2445581.html
