论刑事裁判涉财产部分执行中案外人异议制度
发布时间：2019-04-10 18:35
【摘要】：刑事裁判涉财产执行中的案外人财产权保护问题,其性质属于刑民交叉问题。因此这种问题的解决,需要适用民事执行的规则,案外人异议之诉制度,以公法债权实现论的视角来解释刑事执行适用民事规则的合理性。然而在适用这一制度时,尚有一些关节未打通,赋予刑事检察机关,刑事执行申请权,补缺诉讼中主体缺位的不足,明确涉案财产的范围与当事人可以提出案外人异议的实体权利范围。在此基础上参照民事执行规则中案外人异议制度的规定,构建刑事裁判涉财产执行中的案外人异议之诉制度,进而更好地保护刑事裁判涉财产执行中的案外人财产权益。
[Abstract]:Criminal judgment is involved in the protection of property rights of outsiders in property execution, and its nature belongs to the cross-issue between criminal and civil. Therefore, to solve this problem, it is necessary to apply the rules of civil execution, the system of objection of the outsider, and explain the rationality of the application of civil rules in criminal execution from the perspective of the realization of creditor's rights in public law. However, in the application of this system, there are still some joints that have not been opened, giving the criminal procuratorial organs, the right to apply for criminal execution, and the shortage of the main body in the remedial proceedings. Define the scope of the property involved and the scope of substantive rights that the parties may challenge by an outsider. On this basis, referring to the provisions of the dissent system of the outsider in the civil execution rules, the author constructs the litigation system of the dissent of the outsider in the execution of the property in the criminal judgment, so as to better protect the property rights and interests of the outsider in the execution of the property in the criminal judgment.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2456029
[Abstract]:Criminal judgment is involved in the protection of property rights of outsiders in property execution, and its nature belongs to the cross-issue between criminal and civil. Therefore, to solve this problem, it is necessary to apply the rules of civil execution, the system of objection of the outsider, and explain the rationality of the application of civil rules in criminal execution from the perspective of the realization of creditor's rights in public law. However, in the application of this system, there are still some joints that have not been opened, giving the criminal procuratorial organs, the right to apply for criminal execution, and the shortage of the main body in the remedial proceedings. Define the scope of the property involved and the scope of substantive rights that the parties may challenge by an outsider. On this basis, referring to the provisions of the dissent system of the outsider in the civil execution rules, the author constructs the litigation system of the dissent of the outsider in the execution of the property in the criminal judgment, so as to better protect the property rights and interests of the outsider in the execution of the property in the criminal judgment.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 乔宇;;论财产刑执行的法律问题——以财产刑制度性执行难为中心[J];法律适用;2015年10期
2 陈醇;;非法集资刑事案件涉案财产处置程序的商法之维[J];法学研究;2015年05期
3 宋英辉;曹文智;;论刑民交叉案件程序冲突的协调[J];河南社会科学;2015年05期
4 吴光升;;案外第三人定罪没收参与模式:比较、反思与重构[J];中国刑事法杂志;2015年04期
5 吴光升;;论未定罪没收利害关系人的抗辩事由[J];政治与法律;2015年08期
6 孙国祥;;刑事诉讼涉案财物处理若干问题研究[J];人民检察;2015年09期
7 曹文智;窦闽;;论善意取得制度在刑事诉讼中的确立[J];江西警察学院学报;2015年02期
8 陈卫东;李响;;论违法所得没收特别程序中的利害关系人[J];政法论坛;2015年01期
9 刘贵祥;闫燕;;《关于刑事裁判涉财产部分执行的若干规定》的理解与适用[J];人民司法;2015年01期
10 史浩明;;时限:化解“占有脱离类赃物”适用善意取得争议的钥匙[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年05期
，本文编号：2456029
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2456029.html
