刑事证据裁判原则研究

发布时间：2019-05-12 18:35

【摘要】：随着我国法治化进程的加快,法院认定犯罪事实的证据依据必须遵循刑事证据裁判原则,刑事证据裁判原则衡量在刑事案件中证据是否具有证明能力。因此,证据必须要具备证据能力,才能被采用,而证据能否被采纳,需要依据证据裁判原则。本文偏向于理论研究,采用文献研究法、比较分析法和实证分析法三种方法,对刑事证据裁判原则相关法律问题进行研究和探讨。在对刑事证据裁判原则的理论基础和具体内容的阐述过程中,发现刑事证据裁判原则在实践中的不足之处,并提出相应的完善措施。以完善刑事证据裁判原则来促进我国法治化的进程。目前我国证据裁判原则中所存在的问题,首先刑事证据裁判原则的高位阶法律不完善,其次证据规则体系难以满足刑事证据裁判原则的要求,最后刑事证据裁判原则的相关辅助制度存在缺陷。本文通过研究国外的一些成熟的法律规范,在此基础之上,结合我国具体的国情,提出了相应的法律规则构想。针对我国现行的刑事证据裁判原则中所存在的问题,我国应首先完善刑事证据裁判原则的相关法律规定,首先完善高阶位法律以及其证据规则的适用范围;其次完善证据规则体系;最后逐渐的完善该裁判原则的辅助制度,表现在强化法官独立审判制度、构建判决文书说理制度、确立并贯彻无罪推定原则。只有这样,才能不断的完善我国的证据裁判原则。希望通过本文的研究,更好的从理论上对证据裁判原则进行理解和认知,从而对我国刑事证据裁判原则的实践做出力所能及的贡献。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the process of legalization in our country, the evidence basis of criminal facts determined by the court must follow the principle of judging criminal evidence, and the principle of adjudication of criminal evidence measures whether the evidence has the ability to prove in criminal cases. Therefore, evidence must have the ability of evidence in order to be adopted, and whether the evidence can be accepted or not needs to be based on the principle of evidence adjudication. This paper focuses on theoretical research, using literature research method, comparative analysis method and empirical analysis method to study and discuss the legal issues related to the principle of criminal evidence adjudication. In the process of expounding the theoretical basis and concrete content of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication, this paper finds out the shortcomings of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication in practice, and puts forward some corresponding perfect measures. To improve the principle of criminal evidence adjudication to promote the process of rule of law in our country. At present, the problems existing in the principle of evidence adjudication in our country are as follows: first, the high-ranking law of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication is not perfect, and secondly, the system of evidence rules is difficult to meet the requirements of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication. Finally, there are some defects in the auxiliary system of criminal evidence adjudication principle. Based on the study of some mature legal norms abroad and combined with the specific national conditions of our country, this paper puts forward the corresponding legal rules. In view of the problems existing in the current principle of criminal evidence adjudication in our country, our country should first perfect the relevant legal provisions of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication, and first perfect the higher order law and the scope of application of its evidence rules. Secondly, perfect the system of evidence rules; finally, gradually improve the auxiliary system of the adjudication principle, strengthen the judge's independent trial system, construct the reasoning system of judgment documents, and establish and implement the principle of presumption of innocence. Only in this way, can we constantly improve the principle of evidence adjudication in our country. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, we can better understand and recognize the principle of evidence adjudication in theory, so as to make the best contribution to the practice of the principle of criminal evidence adjudication in our country.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】