行政诉讼跨区域集中管辖研究

发布时间：2019-06-04 04:00

【摘要】：跨区域集中管辖是指人民法院将某一区域的一审行政诉讼案件交由一个或几个特定的法院管辖的制度。目前跨区域集中管辖的改革试点在我国各地相继铺开。在现阶段司法体制转型的进程中,选择改革触动面效小的跨区域集中管辖模式具有相对明显的优势。实践表明,跨区域集中管辖对于促进司法公正、破除地方干预、维护司法的统一性、优化资源配置具有极其重要的意义。但是,因其制度上的不稳定性以及多方面的原因,施行效果并没有完全达到人们的预期。跨区域集中管辖是一种过渡性、开放度较高的管辖模式,作为行政诉讼管辖制度改革的探路灯,对于提高司法的公信力具有积极的意义,未来一段时间内仍将继续存在。因此,完善跨区域集中管辖制度的施行路径势在必行。本文将跨区域集中管辖的相关概念进行对比分析,并且从跨区域集中管辖实施以来取得的成效、意义等方面深入剖析了跨区域集中管辖方式对于改革我国现行行政诉讼体制的有效性。通过较为全面地总结新《行政诉讼法》颁布后,我国各地区推行跨区域集中管辖试点改革的不同模式经验,发现跨区域集中管辖制度在具体运作中存在着调查取证难、执行难、集中管辖法院的选取缺乏统一的标准、无法从根本上摆脱行政干预等突出问题。为完善跨区域集中管辖制度,提升司法的公正性与公信力,应当在科学、合理的内在要求下,通过完善跨区域管辖案件的调查取证和执行制度、建立统一的确定跨区域集中管辖法院的标准、制定跨区域集中管辖的审理程序和便民措施、充分赋予原告选择管辖权、健全集中管辖法院依法独立行使行政审判权的保障机制等手段,完善现有的跨区域集中管辖制度,以期解决我国行政诉讼体制中的现实问题,弱化行政诉讼体制中固有缺陷的影响,早日实现司法公正的美好愿景。
[Abstract]:Cross-regional centralized jurisdiction refers to the system in which the people's court places the administrative litigation case of first instance in a certain area under the jurisdiction of one or more specific courts. At present, cross-regional centralized jurisdiction reform pilot has been spread out in various parts of our country. In the process of judicial system transformation at present, the choice of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction mode with little touching effect has relatively obvious advantages. The practice shows that cross-regional centralized jurisdiction is of great significance to promote judicial justice, break local intervention, maintain judicial unity and optimize the allocation of resources. However, due to the instability of its system and many reasons, the effect of implementation has not fully met people's expectations. Cross-regional centralized jurisdiction is a transitional and open jurisdiction mode. As a probe into the reform of administrative litigation jurisdiction system, it is of positive significance to improve the credibility of the judiciary, and will continue to exist in the future. Therefore, it is imperative to improve the implementation path of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction system. In this paper, the related concepts of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction are compared and analyzed, and the results achieved since the implementation of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction, This paper analyzes the effectiveness of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction in reforming the current administrative litigation system in China. After the promulgation of the new Administrative procedure Law, it is found that it is difficult to investigate and obtain evidence in the concrete operation of the cross-regional centralized jurisdiction system by summing up the experiences of different models and experiences of carrying out the pilot reform of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction in various regions of our country. The selection of centralized courts lacks unified standards and can not fundamentally get rid of outstanding problems such as administrative intervention. In order to perfect the system of centralized jurisdiction across regions and enhance the fairness and credibility of justice, we should perfect the system of investigation, evidence collection and execution of cases under cross-regional jurisdiction under the inherent requirements of science and reasonableness. To establish a unified standard for determining cross-regional centralized jurisdiction courts, to formulate trial procedures and measures for the convenience of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction, and to give full jurisdiction to plaintiffs to choose jurisdiction, We will improve the safeguard mechanism for centralized courts to exercise administrative jurisdiction independently in accordance with the law, and improve the existing cross-regional centralized jurisdiction system in order to solve the practical problems in the administrative litigation system of our country. Weaken the influence of inherent defects in administrative litigation system, and realize the good vision of judicial justice as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】