法秩序统一视野下的诉讼程序与法律效果的多元性——以竞合型刑民交叉案件为视角
发布时间：2019-08-04 09:22
【摘要】："刑事优于民事"的价值取向在于以国家公权追诉犯罪取代个人私权救济,这是长期形成的国家利益至上指导思想在处理刑民交叉案件上的必然体现。刑事优于民事而忽视私权救济程序必然造成法秩序内的矛盾和不协调。同一法律事实涉及刑事犯罪和民事纠纷,公权追究刑事犯罪不应当排斥受害人私权救济程序。对同一法律事实进行刑事和民事不同法律效果的评判,并非是诉讼的冲突和矛盾,正是法秩序内在协调性和外在统一性的表现。
[Abstract]:The value orientation of "criminal superior to civil" lies in replacing the relief of individual private rights with the crime of national public right prosecution, which is the inevitable embodiment of the long-formed guiding ideology of the supremacy of national interests in dealing with the cross cases between the criminal and the people. The criminal law is superior to the civil law while neglecting the private right relief procedure, which will inevitably lead to the contradiction and disharmony in the legal order. The same legal fact involves criminal and civil disputes, and the public right to investigate criminal crimes should not exclude the victim's private right relief procedure. Judging the different legal effects of criminal and civil law on the same legal fact is not the conflict and contradiction of litigation, but the manifestation of the internal coordination and external unity of the legal order.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学王健法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2;D925.1
本文编号：2522839
[Abstract]:The value orientation of "criminal superior to civil" lies in replacing the relief of individual private rights with the crime of national public right prosecution, which is the inevitable embodiment of the long-formed guiding ideology of the supremacy of national interests in dealing with the cross cases between the criminal and the people. The criminal law is superior to the civil law while neglecting the private right relief procedure, which will inevitably lead to the contradiction and disharmony in the legal order. The same legal fact involves criminal and civil disputes, and the public right to investigate criminal crimes should not exclude the victim's private right relief procedure. Judging the different legal effects of criminal and civil law on the same legal fact is not the conflict and contradiction of litigation, but the manifestation of the internal coordination and external unity of the legal order.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学王健法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王亚明;;一事不再理与刑民交叉问题研究[J];法律适用;2011年11期
2 时延安;;刑罚的正当性探究——从权利出发[J];法制与社会发展;2010年02期
3 魏东;钟凯;;论刑民交叉及其关涉问题[J];四川警察学院学报;2009年04期
4 印仕柏;;民刑交叉案件管辖问题研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年06期
5 Detlev Frehsee;陈虎;;德国刑事法律中的赔偿和犯罪人—被害人和解:发展历程与理论内涵[J];人大法律评论;2009年01期
6 杨亚民;包文炯;;刑事优先原则适用现状的考量[J];法学;2006年02期
7 江伟,范跃如;刑民交叉案件处理机制研究[J];法商研究;2005年04期
8 童可兴;刑民交错案件的司法界定[J];人民检察;2004年06期
9 大谷实,黎宏;犯罪被害人及其补偿[J];中国刑事法杂志;2000年02期
10 李祖军,田毅平;民事诉讼目的论纲[J];现代法学;1998年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘宇;民刑关系要论[D];吉林大学;2007年
，本文编号：2522839
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2522839.html
