新《刑事诉讼法》实施前后刑事拘留适用的基本情况、变化及完善——基于东、中、西部三个基层法院判决样本的实证研究
发布时间：2019-08-05 15:47
【摘要】：通过对东、中、西部三个不同基层法院2013年1月至2014年3月公开的判决书中被告人基本情况的统计与分析得知,新《刑事诉讼法》实施前后刑事拘留均是公安机关在侦查阶段适用率最高的强制措施,但不同地区的公安机关对特殊类型案件的处理方式及各地人口结构的差异造成刑拘的适用率存在一定差异;在同一地区,刑拘适用率因案而异;所涉犯罪的严重性、某类案件的发案频率及办案人员对此类案件的处理方式等五个因素对刑拘的适用率具有影响;刑拘的到案功能较弱,刑拘前采用传唤、拘传等措施成为常态;获得相对充裕的侦查取证时间是刑拘的主要目的;刑拘后,逮捕和取保候审是强制措施变更的主要方式。新《刑事诉讼法》实施后,延长刑拘期间的现象仍然突出,但犯罪嫌疑人因刑拘被剥夺人身自由的时间呈缩短趋势;刑拘转捕率有所下降,取保候审的比例相对上升。刑拘适用情况的这些变化表明我国公安机关刑事执法规范化建设取得了一定的积极成果,刑事司法领域对人身自由的程序保障得到了实质性强化。
[Abstract]:Through the statistics and analysis of the basic situation of the defendants in the judgments published by three different grass-roots courts in the east, middle and west from January 2013 to March 2014, it is found that criminal detention before and after the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law is the coercive measure with the highest application rate of public security organs in the investigation stage. However, there are some differences in the applicable rate of criminal detention caused by the differences of handling methods and population structure of special types of cases by public security organs in different regions. In the same region, the applicable rate of criminal detention varies from case to case; five factors, such as the seriousness of the crime involved, the frequency of the occurrence of certain cases and the way in which such cases are dealt with by the operators, have an impact on the applicable rate of criminal detention; the function of criminal detention is weak, and the measures such as summons and subpoenas before criminal detention become the norm; obtaining relatively sufficient time for investigation and evidence collection is the main purpose of criminal detention. After criminal detention, arrest and bail pending trial are the main ways to change coercive measures. After the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, the phenomenon of prolonging the period of criminal detention is still prominent, but the time for criminal suspects to be deprived of their personal liberty due to criminal detention tends to shorten, and the rate of transfer of criminal detention has decreased, and the proportion of people awaiting trial on bail has relatively increased. These changes in the application of criminal detention show that the standardization of criminal law enforcement in public security organs in our country has achieved some positive results, and the procedural guarantee of personal freedom in the field of criminal justice has been substantially strengthened.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国地方性刑事司法规则研究”(项目编号:11BFX124)的阶段性成果 西南政法大学2013年度博士研究生科研创新计划项目(项目编号:2013XZYJS003)资助
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:Through the statistics and analysis of the basic situation of the defendants in the judgments published by three different grass-roots courts in the east, middle and west from January 2013 to March 2014, it is found that criminal detention before and after the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law is the coercive measure with the highest application rate of public security organs in the investigation stage. However, there are some differences in the applicable rate of criminal detention caused by the differences of handling methods and population structure of special types of cases by public security organs in different regions. In the same region, the applicable rate of criminal detention varies from case to case; five factors, such as the seriousness of the crime involved, the frequency of the occurrence of certain cases and the way in which such cases are dealt with by the operators, have an impact on the applicable rate of criminal detention; the function of criminal detention is weak, and the measures such as summons and subpoenas before criminal detention become the norm; obtaining relatively sufficient time for investigation and evidence collection is the main purpose of criminal detention. After criminal detention, arrest and bail pending trial are the main ways to change coercive measures. After the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, the phenomenon of prolonging the period of criminal detention is still prominent, but the time for criminal suspects to be deprived of their personal liberty due to criminal detention tends to shorten, and the rate of transfer of criminal detention has decreased, and the proportion of people awaiting trial on bail has relatively increased. These changes in the application of criminal detention show that the standardization of criminal law enforcement in public security organs in our country has achieved some positive results, and the procedural guarantee of personal freedom in the field of criminal justice has been substantially strengthened.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国地方性刑事司法规则研究”(项目编号:11BFX124)的阶段性成果 西南政法大学2013年度博士研究生科研创新计划项目(项目编号:2013XZYJS003)资助
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 左卫民;;侦查羁押制度改革:刑诉法修改的重要方面[J];人民检察;2008年24期
2 ;押解外逃嫌疑人的时间是否应计入办案期限[J];人民检察;2006年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯俊伟;;行政执法证据进入刑事诉讼的类型分析——基于比较法的视角[J];比较法研究;2014年02期
2 蔡杰;刘晶;;刑事卷宗移送制度的轮回性改革之反思[J];法学评论;2014年01期
3 王晨辰;周轶;;技术侦查制度之检讨[J];法律适用;2014年02期
4 陈瑞华;;辩护律师调查取证的三种模式[J];法商研究;2014年01期
5 陈利红;;刑事专家辅助人的几点思考[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2014年01期
6 刘晶;;刑事庭前准备程序的反思与重构[J];东方法学;2014年03期
7 陈盛;纵博;;瑕疵证据规定的法律解释分析——以《刑事诉讼法》第54条为对象[J];法律方法;2014年00期
8 黄伯青;王明森;;庭前会议制度的理论探究和实践构建[J];法治研究;2014年06期
9 田力男;;辩方审前权利争议性问题的破解[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2014年03期
10 孔祥承;;侦查阶段被追诉人阅卷权研究——以辩护人阅卷权的性质为视角[J];研究生法学;2014年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 周健;逮捕条件论[D];中国政法大学;2012年
2 张\，
本文编号：2523207
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2523207.html
