实体与程序双层次罪数论体系的构建

发布时间：2017-12-30 16:04

本文关键词：实体与程序双层次罪数论体系的构建　出处：《国家检察官学院学报》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：实体上罪数论的目的在于追求罪刑均衡,而程序上的罪数论旨在禁止双重危险。我国刑法总则未规定一罪形态,使得我们可以分别基于罪刑均衡原则与禁止双重危险原则,构建实体与程序双层次的罪数论体系。理论上的牵连犯、连续犯、吸收犯因有违罪刑均衡原则应被取消,分别作为包括一罪和数罪并罚处理。应以自然意义上的行为个数确定程序上的一罪与数罪,因而包括一罪(包括集合犯、接续犯、共罚的事后行为等)不生一事不再理效力,而法条竞合、想象竞合犯、继续犯、结果加重犯(限于一个行为的类型)因只有一个行为,应受一事不再理原则的约束,判决生效后对于遗漏的部分事实不得再行追诉,复行为犯、结合犯因存在两个自然意义上的行为,不受一事不再理原则的约束。
[Abstract]:The entity of crimes is to pursue the balance between crime and punishment, and the procedure of crime number in case of prohibition of double jeopardy. Our criminal law has not defined a crime, we can make the relation between the principle and the principle of prohibition of double jeopardy based on the construction of the entity and procedure of two levels of crimes system. In theory the implicated offender continuous offence, absorption crime violates the principle of balance between crime and punishment should be canceled, as including a crime and should be based on the number of graft treatment. The nature of the behavior to determine a crime and several crimes on the program, which includes a crime (including the collection of prisoners, prisoners succeeded, fined a total of ex post behavior) not born in idem potency, and concurrence, imaginative joinder of offenses, continuous crime, the aggravated consequential offence (limited to type A behavior) because of only one act, shall be governed by the principle of non bis in idem constraints on the missing part of the facts after the entry into force of the judgment No further prosecution, complex act offense, combined offense, because of the existence of two natural meanings, is not bound by the principle of no longer.

【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.1
【正文快照】： 学界普遍意识到,我国现有的罪数论体系臃肿、繁杂,漏洞百出,而且理论严重脱离实践,近年来的研究甚至陷入了各说各话的局面。[1]为此,有学者主张应当引进德国的竞合论,以代替目前混乱不堪的罪数论。[2]但殊不知,竞合论本身也已“成为学理上无奈的痛,亦成为实务上深怕碰触的伤痕

【相似文献】