减刑假释实行申请制之倡导

发布时间：2018-01-02 14:38

本文关键词：减刑假释实行申请制之倡导　出处：《陕西学前师范学院学报》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：根据我国刑法规定,减刑假释程序是由执行机关提出减刑假释意见书,法院组成合议庭作出裁定。现有制度存在很大不合理性,犯罪人作为减刑假释的直接获益人,被排斥在程序之外并不能保障犯罪人的利益,而且会导致假释使用率被执行机关人为降低。减刑假释本质都应采用权利说,二者本质上并无差别,且优劣互补,只是具体执行方式不同,因此减刑假释应当实行申请制,由犯罪人根据自身情况自由选择减刑或者假释并先行提出申请,执行机关提出意见书,法院居中裁定。减刑假释实行申请制有利于司法机关选择真正适合犯罪人的执行措施,提高犯罪人改造的积极性,使得对犯罪人的改造更加有效、更加彻底,同时也保障了犯罪人的合法权益。
[Abstract]:According to China's criminal law, the commutation and parole is the executing organ submission commutation parole, a collegial panel of the court ruling. The existing system is very unreasonable, the criminal as commutation and parole directly benefit people, excluded from the outside of the program and can not guarantee the crime to the interests of the people, and will lead to the use rate of parole execution human organs decreased. The essence of commutation and parole should be adopted right to say, there is no difference in essence between the two, and the complementary advantages, but the specific implementation in different ways, so the commutation and parole shall be filed by the criminal system, are free to choose according to their own commutation or parole and apply in advance, the executive organ of submission, the court ruled that the middle. The implementation of the application of commutation and parole system is conducive to the judicial organs criminal enforcement measures for real, enhance the enthusiasm of the rehabilitation of offenders, the person of the crime The reform is more effective and more thorough, and it also guarantees the legitimate rights and interests of the perpetrators.

【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：西南政法大学法学院2015级研究生科研创新一般项目(FXYYB2015134)
【分类号】：D924.1
【正文快照】： 减刑假释本质相同,只是在具体执行方式上存在差异,法律规定执行机关为减刑假释的提出主体多有不妥。笔者主张将减刑假释程序改为申请制,应当赋予犯罪人减刑假释的申请权,执行机关根据自身实际执行条件提出意见书,最终由法院居中裁定。一、减刑假释程序规定不合理我国刑法第七

【相似文献】