关于我国刑法不存在片面共犯的探究

发布时间：2018-01-08 21:09

本文关键词：关于我国刑法不存在片面共犯的探究　出处：《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：关于片面共犯是否应以共同犯罪论处,理论界有肯定说与否定说之争。因果共犯论只是为共犯提供了处罚根据,并未实际解决片面共犯是否成立共犯的问题。肯定说和否定说的理论基础是行为共同说与犯罪共同说。以行为共同说为基础所推演的结论不具有唯一性,结合我国刑法的规定,应当从解释论上得出否定说的结论。片面共犯尽管在理论上可以成立,但是依据外国刑法解释出的结论并非一定能适用于我国的司法实践。
[Abstract]:As to whether one-sided accomplice should be treated as joint crime, there is a dispute between affirmation and negation in the theoretical circle. The theory of causal accomplice only provides the punishment basis for accomplice. Whether one-sided accomplice is an accomplice or not has not been solved in practice. The theoretical basis of affirmative theory and negation theory is the joint theory of behavior and crime. The conclusion based on the theory of joint behavior is not unique. In combination with the provisions of our criminal law, we should draw the conclusion of negation from the theory of interpretation, although one-sided accomplice can be established in theory. But the conclusion interpreted according to foreign criminal law is not necessarily applicable to our judicial practice.
【作者单位】：苏州大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.1
【正文快照】： 片面共犯是指行为人有与他人共同实施犯罪的意思,并实际参与他人的犯罪行为,但他人并不知情的犯罪形态。例如,甲追杀丙,乙知悉并且也希望置丙于死地,便在甲追杀丙的过程中设置障碍,阻碍丙逃跑,使甲顺利完成犯罪,甲对此却毫不知情(以下简称“典型案例”)。就不知情的甲而言,只

【相似文献】