当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

受贿罪死缓适用问题研究

发布时间:2018-01-09 13:34

  本文关键词:受贿罪死缓适用问题研究 出处:《暨南大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 死刑 非暴力犯罪 死缓 受贿罪


【摘要】:限制乃至废除死刑的适用,,已经成为一种世界趋势。然而,受“重典治吏”和重刑思想的影响,我国贪污贿赂犯罪的立法依然保留了死刑的规定,实践中仍时有适用。然而,由于经济快速发展、贪污受贿数额的巨大悬殊,立法规定的量刑标准多年未经修改,以及自上而下或自下而上地推进反腐败工作的自身发展等等原因,究竟如何在贪污贿赂领域限制死刑,公正地适用刑罚则是当下备受关注的焦点问题。我国宽严相济的刑事政策出台伊始,将刑法打击的重点指向了那些严重危害国家安全、社会稳定和人民利益的犯罪,但是,作为打击犯罪的刑事政策,受贿罪在实际认定与处理中也自然概莫能外;从国际公约来看,《公民权利与政治权利公约》明确要求对非暴力犯罪废除死刑,我国也已经承诺尽快履行该公约,受贿犯罪,作为非暴力犯罪的一种,对其死刑一时无法废除时,在适用上加以限制便是其题中应有之意。况且,我国死刑适用中的少杀、慎杀传统也要求限制死刑。限制受贿罪死刑适用,首先是限制死刑立即执行的判决,其次便是减少死刑的实际执行。当前,在反腐呼声高涨,不能立即停止或减少受贿罪死刑判决的情况下,扩大受贿罪死缓适用的规模倒是行之有效的对策。 对受贿罪死缓适用的扩大并不意味着受贿罪死缓判决的随意化。尽管,对受贿罪扩大死缓适用具有诸多的优点,但是也存在一定的问题,所以,对受贿罪扩大死缓适用,要坚持罪刑法定、限制减刑原则,不能随意而为。在构建对受贿罪扩大适用死缓具体制度时,死缓适用对象、法官裁量权以及对受贿罪死缓减刑、假释等方面都要有所把握,这是对受贿罪限制死刑、扩大死缓适用必须考虑的重点。
[Abstract]:It has become a world trend to restrict and even abolish the application of the death penalty. However, the legislation of corruption and bribery in our country still retains the provisions of the death penalty under the influence of the thought of "severely regulating officials" and "heavy punishment". However, due to the rapid development of the economy and the huge disparity in the amount of corruption and bribery, the standard of sentencing stipulated by the legislation has not been modified for many years. As well as the top-down or bottom-up anti-corruption work to promote its own development, and so on, how to restrict the death penalty in the area of corruption and bribery. The fair application of punishment is the focus of attention at present. At the beginning of the criminal policy of leniency and strict punishment, the focus of the criminal law strike at those serious harm to national security. The crime of social stability and the interests of the people, however, as a criminal policy to combat crime, bribery crime in the actual identification and treatment of nature can not be excluded; From the international conventions, the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights explicitly requires the abolition of the death penalty for non-violent crimes, China has also promised to fulfil the Convention as soon as possible, bribery crime, as a non-violent crime. When it is impossible to abolish the death penalty for a time, it is necessary to restrict its application. Moreover, in our country, the death penalty is limited in the application of the death penalty, and the tradition of careful killing also requires the restriction of the death penalty and the restriction of the application of the death penalty for the crime of accepting bribes. The first is to restrict the immediate execution of the death penalty, the second is to reduce the actual execution of the death penalty. At present, in the case of anti-corruption calls, can not immediately stop or reduce the death penalty sentence for bribery. It is an effective countermeasure to expand the application scale of death penalty suspension of bribery crime. The extension of the application of the death penalty suspension does not mean that the punishment of the death penalty suspension of bribery is arbitrary. Although there are many advantages in extending the application of the death penalty reprieve to the bribery crime, there are still some problems, so. To extend the application of death reprieve to the crime of accepting bribes, we should adhere to the principle of legally prescribed punishment and limit the commutation of sentence, and we should not do it at will. When we construct the specific system of extending the application of death reprieve to the crime of accepting bribes, the object of death penalty should be suspended. The judge's discretion, the commutation of death sentence and parole of bribery crime should be assured, which is the key to restrict the death penalty and expand the application of death reprieve.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D924.392

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 邵伟;;职务犯罪滥用死缓现象及治理对策[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期

2 李洁;;日本受贿罪立法及对我国的借鉴价值[J];北方法学;2007年01期

3 孙国祥;;受贿罪量刑中的宽严失据问题——基于2010年省部级高官受贿案件的研析[J];法学;2011年08期

4 田立文;;职务犯罪量刑轻缓化分析探讨[J];河南社会科学;2010年03期

5 张跃华;略论死缓制度的缺陷[J];绍兴文理学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年05期

6 成良文;;“死缓”应改为独立刑种[J];现代法学;1990年02期

7 刘生荣,胡云腾;论受贿罪的定罪与量刑[J];中国法学;1999年01期

8 钊作俊;;受贿罪死刑适用社会效果调查研究[J];政治与法律;2006年04期

9 胡绍宝;李慧敏;;受贿罪量刑问题的立法反思——一个批判性的视角[J];中共四川省委党校学报;2007年01期



本文编号:1401631

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1401631.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bf0fe***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com