浅析想象竞合与法条竞合的区分标准和刑罚适用问题

发布时间：2018-01-17 02:23

本文关键词：浅析想象竞合与法条竞合的区分标准和刑罚适用问题　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：想象竞合和法条竞合是我国刑法领域中比较复杂的问题,此问题也占有重要的地位。对于二者的区分标准,很多刑法学者还是有很大的争议,纷纷提出了不同的学说,但各有利弊,笔者在诸多大家的基础上提出了自己的看法。同时对于二者具体怎么适用刑罚的问题还是有待进一步研究探讨,这些无疑都对理论和司法实务都有至关重要的作用。本文分为上下两篇。上篇,主要讲述想象竞合和法条竞合的概念和特征,以及二者的区分方法。第一节,分析了想象竞合的概念和特征,特别对其行为的性质和个数,主观罪过的形式都做出了比较细致的分析。笔者认为想象竞合中一行为有多个刑法学上的意义,同时分析这种理论并不与"禁止重复评价原则"相抵触。笔者在主观方面主张多种罪过都可以。第二节,分析了法条竞合的概念和特征,同时从直观上与想象竞合做出比较。第三节,在分析二者概念和本质的基础上,举出目前存在的有关二者区分标准的主要学说,包括法条关系说,犯罪构成要件说,客体说和全部评价说,笔者分别分析各个学说的优缺点,并用实际例子证明现有学说都不能很快捷的解决实务中的问题。第四节,在现有学说的基础上,笔者提出了自己的区分标准。即"行为区分法益说"把行为区分理论和法益说相结合来讨论,并用例子进行验证。下篇,主要解决的是在区分出二者之后的问题,即具体适用刑罚的问题。第一节,分析了想象竞合的刑罚适用,并从行为,罪过等方面阐述其均轻于多次数罪,因此不应数罪并罚。第二节,在分析法条竞合的刑罚适用时具体讨论两种特殊的情况,即特殊法轻于普通法时的刑罚适用问题,以及按照特殊法条的行为方式但是不符合特殊法条时能否适用普通法条的刑罚适用问题。笔者认为这两个本质上应是一个问题,在探讨这个问题时应该抛弃"重型主义"的思想,遵循"罪刑法定"的基本原则,应从多角度给予分析,以做出较合理地解释。
[Abstract]:It is a complex problem in the field of criminal law of our country to imagine competing and competing with each other, and this problem also occupies an important position. Many criminal scholars still have great controversy about the standard of the distinction between the two. Have put forward different theories, but have their own advantages and disadvantages, the author put forward their own views on the basis of a lot of people. At the same time, the specific application of the penalty for the two issues still need to be further studied. This article is divided into two parts. The first part mainly describes the concept and characteristics of imaginative concurrence and law competition, as well as the methods to distinguish the two. This paper analyzes the concept and characteristics of imaginative concurrence, especially the nature and number of its behavior, and the form of subjective sin. The author thinks that an act of imaginative concurrence has many meanings in criminal law. At the same time, analysis of this theory does not conflict with the "prohibition of repeated evaluation principle". The author claims that many kinds of sins can be done subjectively. The second section, analyzes the concept and characteristics of competing laws. At the same time, from the visual and imaginative competing to make a comparison. The third section, on the basis of analysis of the two concepts and nature of the two points of view of the existing standards of distinction between the main theories, including the rule of law relationship theory. The author analyzes the merits and demerits of each theory, and proves that the existing theories can not solve the problems in practice very quickly. Section 4th. On the basis of the existing theories, the author puts forward his own criterion of differentiation, that is, the theory of behavioral differentiation and the theory of legal interests, which is discussed by combining the theory of behavioral differentiation with the theory of legal interests, and verified by examples. The main solution is the problem after distinguishing the two, that is, the specific application of penalty. The first section analyzes the application of imaginative competing penalty, and from the aspects of behavior, crime and other aspects, it is less than the number of crimes. Therefore, should not be punished for a number of crimes. The second section, in the analysis of the concurrent application of penalties, the specific discussion of two special circumstances, that is, the special law is less than the common law of the application of the penalty. And according to the behavior of the special provisions but not in accordance with the special provisions of the application of ordinary law can be applicable to the penalty. The author believes that these two essentially should be a problem. When discussing this problem, we should abandon the thought of "heavy-duty doctrine", follow the basic principle of "legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime", and analyze it from various angles in order to make a more reasonable explanation.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】