论数额加重犯未遂的法定刑适用

发布时间：2018-01-27 14:47

本文关键词： 数额加重犯犯罪未遂法定刑适用　出处：《法学》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：不管是将我国刑法分则中的法定刑升格条件分为加重的犯罪构成与量刑规则,还是进一步细分为典型的(罪体)加重构成要素与典型的量刑规则及非典型的罪量加重构成要素,抑或分为真正的不法加重要素与不真正的不法加重要素,在主观上以数额巨大或者特别巨大的财物为目标的数额加重犯中,其未遂都只能一律适用基本犯的法定刑,而不能适用数额巨大或者特别巨大的法定刑。其背后的理论根据是客观主义刑法,考虑的基础是不法行为对法益侵害的危险程度,目的是为了实现罪责刑相适应和刑罚的公正。因此,司法实践必须摒弃"心有多恶,刑就有多重"的主观主义量刑观,转向以客观行为的法益侵害或者危险为基础的客观主义量刑观,在认定上坚持从客观到主观,从不法到责任的司法逻辑。
[Abstract]:Whether it is to divide the legal penalty upgrading condition in the special provisions of criminal law into aggravated crime constitution and sentencing rules. Or further subdivided into typical (body of crime) aggravating elements and typical sentencing rules and non-typical aggravating elements of the amount of crime, or divided into true illegal aggravating elements and non-real illegal aggravating elements. In subjectively taking the amount of huge or especially huge property as the target of the aggravated crime of the amount, the attempted crime can only be applied to the legal penalty of the basic crime. The theoretical basis behind it is objectivism criminal law, and the basis of consideration is the dangerous degree of illegal acts against legal interests. Therefore, judicial practice must abandon the subjectivist sentencing concept of "how evil the heart is, how heavy the punishment is". Turning to the objectivist view of sentencing based on the infringement of legal interests or danger of objective behavior, the judicial logic from objectivity to subjectivity and from lawlessness to responsibility is adhered to in the determination.
【作者单位】：华侨大学法学院;
【基金】：华侨大学第一期科研启动费资助项目(13SKBS120)阶段性的研究成果
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 根据《刑法》第B条的规定,在犯罪概念上我国采取“定性+定量”的立法模式。换言之,立法机关不仅对某个罪的罪状和行为特征、行为类型进行了描述,还对行为的违法性程度进行了界定。[1]在这种立法思想的指导下,刑法对不少犯罪都规定了情节严重(恶劣)、情节特别严重(恶劣),数额较

【相似文献】