司法工作人员取得赃物行为定性研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 19:12

本文关键词： 司法工作人员赃物取得行为定罪　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法工作人员利用职务取得赃物行为,在当下时有发生,然对其定性却混乱不堪。虽然我国现行刑法中针对赃物的犯罪有专门的规定,但是目前无论在理论界还是在司法实务界对赃物的概念却都没有形成共识,针对司法工作人员取得赃物的犯罪行为更鲜有论述。本文通过分析司法工作人员的取得赃物行为,透过法律条文表面的含义,探求法律规定的实质。以司法工作人员取得赃物行为之一典型案例为切入点,对赃物进行全方面的解构,对司法工作人员取得赃物行为不同类型进行详尽的甄别和梳理,在此基础上围绕对司法工作人员取得赃物不同类型行为的定性展开论述,对司法工作人员取得行为的方式一一梳理,并对涉及的相关罪名(如侵占罪、盗窃罪、贪污罪等等)做出深入探究,对该类行为正确定罪量刑,以期助益解决实践之疑难案例。本文除引言和余论外,主体分为三大部分:一、司法工作人员取得赃物行为的基本概述。此部分重点对赃物的概念由浅入深的进行厘清,对于司法工作人员及取得行为则做以简述。我国刑法对于何为赃物并未明确界定。因此笔者着重对赃物的概念正名,对赃物的界定从赃物之历史变迁及其内涵外延之维度展开,通过古今以及中外比较,得出赃物的概念即赃物在刑法领域内定义为因犯罪所得之财产。司法工作人员即从事侦查、起诉、审判、监督工作的人员。本文重点研究的司法工作人员取得赃物行为是指司法工作人员利用其特定身份或工作便利,通过各种不合法手段占有赃物的行为。二、司法工作人员取得赃物行为的类型。此部分将从刑法框架内探究司法工作人员取得赃物行为之类型,以引言案例为切入点,笔者以取得赃物行为之方式,将行为分为以下几类:侵占式取得赃物行为、窃取式取得赃物行为、枉法式取得赃物行为。三、司法工作人员取得赃物行为的定性。此部分以对司法工作人员取得赃物行为可能涉及的几种类罪为基础,从类罪构成要件之理解展述拙文研究内容。针对侵占式取得赃物行为,笔者从侵占罪、贪污罪以及隐瞒掩饰犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益罪逐一进行辨析。针对窃取式取得赃物行为则从盗窃罪和贪污罪这两个争议罪名展开论述,针对枉法式取得赃物行为则从是否构成徇私枉法罪这一罪名展开讨论,在对几类行为研究基础之上,提出对问题的进一步思考。
[Abstract]:Judicial staff use their duties to obtain stolen goods, which occurs from time to time, but its characterization is chaotic. Although there are special provisions in the current criminal law of our country for the crime of stolen goods. However, at present, there is no consensus on the concept of stolen goods in either the theoretical field or the judicial practice field. The criminal behavior of obtaining stolen goods for judicial staff is less discussed. This paper analyzes the criminal acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff through the surface of the meaning of the legal provisions. To explore the essence of the provisions of the law. Judicial staff to obtain a typical case of stolen goods as a starting point to the stolen goods in all aspects of deconstruction. On the basis of the detailed identification and combing of different types of acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff, the qualitative analysis of different types of acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff is discussed. The way of obtaining behavior of judicial staff is combed one by one, and the related charges (such as embezzlement, theft, embezzlement and so on) are deeply explored, and this kind of behavior is correctly convicted and sentenced. In order to help solve the difficult cases of practice. In addition to the introduction and the conclusion, the main body is divided into three parts: first. This part focuses on the concept of stolen goods from the shallow to clarify. For the judicial staff and the acquisition of conduct to do a brief description. Our criminal law for what is stolen goods is not clearly defined. Therefore, the author focuses on the concept of stolen goods to correct the name. The definition of stolen goods from the historical changes and the connotation of the dimensions of extension, through the ancient and modern as well as the comparison between China and foreign countries. In the field of criminal law, the concept of stolen goods is defined as property derived from crime. Judicial personnel are engaged in investigation, prosecution and trial. Supervision of the personnel. The focus of this article on the acquisition of stolen goods by judicial staff refers to the use of their specific identity or work convenience, through various illegal means of possession of stolen goods. 2. This part will explore the types of acts of stolen goods obtained by judicial staff from the framework of criminal law, with the introduction of cases as the starting point, the author to obtain stolen property behavior. The behavior can be divided into the following categories: embezzlement, theft, perversion. This part is based on several kinds of crimes that may be involved in the acquisition of stolen goods by judicial staff. From the understanding of the constitutive elements of the category of crimes to develop the content of my research. In view of the embezzlement to obtain stolen goods, the author from the embezzlement, embezzlement and concealment of the proceeds of crime. The crime of proceeds of crime is analyzed one by one. The crime of stealing stolen goods is discussed from the two controversial charges of theft and embezzlement. On the basis of the study of several kinds of behavior, the author discusses whether the crime of perverting the law by perverting the law and obtaining stolen goods by perverting the law for personal gain, and puts forward some further thoughts on the problem.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】