规范性构成要件要素的故意及错误——以赵春华非法持有枪支案为例

发布时间：2018-01-31 09:30

本文关键词： 犯罪故意构成要件错误禁止错误规范性构成要件要素　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在赵春华非法持有枪支案中,二审法院与辩护律师的争议之一在于赵春华是否具备犯罪故意。我国刑法明确规定了一个实质的犯罪故意概念,该犯罪故意不仅包含构成要件故意,而且包含罪责故意与不法意识(社会危害性认识)。认定赵春华具备非法持有枪支的故意,首先必须证明其对于"枪支"这一规范性构成要件要素具备完全的意义认识,但从本案的案情来看,根据"外行人领域的平行评价标准",赵春华缺乏这一意义认识,因此成立构成要件错误,从而排除故意;其次必须证明其对于"违反枪支管理规定"这一空白构成要件要素存在明知,但从案情来看,这一明知也无法成立。即使认定赵春华对于"违反枪支管理规定"存在明知,其也可以援引不可避免的禁止错误为其出罪。
[Abstract]:In the case of illegal possession of firearms by Zhao Chunhua, one of the disputes between the court of second instance and the defense lawyer is whether Zhao Chunhua has criminal intent. The intention of the crime not only includes the elements of intent, but also includes the intention of crime and responsibility and the consciousness of lawlessness (social harmfulness cognition). Zhao Chunhua is found to have the intention of illegally holding guns. First of all, it must prove that it has a complete meaning for the "firearm" as a normative component element, but from the case of the case, according to the "parallel evaluation criteria in the field of layman". Zhao Chunhua lacks this meaning cognition, therefore establishes the constitution element mistake, thus excludes intentionally; Secondly, it must prove its knowledge of the "violation of firearms regulation" as a blank constitutive element, but from the point of view of the case. Even if Zhao Chunhua was found to have knowledge of "violating gun regulations," he could invoke the inevitable prohibition of error as a crime.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 目　次一、犯罪故意的构造与错误理论二、对于“枪支”的认识及其错误三、对于“违反枪支管理规定”的认识及其错误四、结语一般认为,故意犯罪的成立不仅要求行为人的行为符合客观构成要件,而且在主观上必须具备故意。在赵春华非法持有枪支一案中,从客观构成要件上看,公众和

【相似文献】