盗窃罪“秘密性”之维护

发布时间：2018-02-08 19:47

本文关键词： 盗窃罪行为秘密性立法司法　出处：《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：盗窃罪作为古老的侵犯财产型犯罪,无论是古代或是日新月异的今天,一直倍受刑法学界的关注,可谓“明星罪名”。在实践中,盗窃行为的各色各样导致司法机关对于盗窃罪的判定争议从未休止过。本文试图对盗窃行为的本质及秘密性的内涵进行具体分析,通过比较国内、国外相关法律规定及各种学说差异,从反面与正面分别指出并论证了保留“秘密性”作为盗窃罪必备要件的主张。全文内容分为三大部分：第一部分阐述了盗窃行为与“秘密性”基本理论内涵。文中首段引入一则案例意在引发读者对不具备秘密性的盗窃行为的定罪加以思考,接下来深入分析了盗窃行为的四个本质特征及其“秘密性”的三个界定标准,用于对本文论证的相关概念加以确定。第二部分介绍了国内和国外对于“秘密性”是否为盗窃罪必备构成要件的不同法律规定及学说立场,并分析了产生诸多争议的法律条文与法律解释方面的原因,提出了“依据法律的思考”,即保留盗窃罪判定之秘密性的主张。第三部分从反面角度与正面角度分别论证了本文的观点,一方面,从反面批判删除说“秘密性”的主张：在立法层面上,其不符合罪刑法定原则；在司法层面上,人为增加解决案件的理论难度。另一方面,通过对主张删除说学者观点的的回应,正面论述了盗窃行为与其他侵财行为的不同,以及“秘密性”作为盗窃罪必备构成要件存在的合理价值。本文支持保留盗窃罪的“秘密性”要件,不仅符合罪责刑相适应的刑法基本原则,也体现了我国刑法的谦抑精神,解决了现行刑法对盗窃罪行为方式规定过于简单,而实践中犯罪行为变化多端导致的刑法适用尴尬难题。
[Abstract]:Larceny, as an ancient crime of infringing on property, has been concerned by the criminal law circle all the time, whether in ancient times or in the ever-changing day. It can be described as "star crime". In practice, the crime of larceny can be described as "crime of star". As a result of various acts of theft, the judicial organs have never stopped the controversy over the determination of the crime of theft. This paper attempts to make a concrete analysis of the essence and the connotation of the secrecy of the theft, and through the comparison of domestic, This paper points out and demonstrates the idea of keeping "secrecy" as the essential element of larceny from the opposite side and the positive side. The content of this paper is divided into three parts:. The first part expounds the basic theoretical connotations of theft and "secrecy". The first paragraph of this paper introduces a case to arouse readers to think about the conviction of theft without secrecy. Then, it analyzes the four essential characteristics of theft and the three criteria of "secrecy", which is used to confirm the relevant concepts of this paper. The second part introduces the different legal provisions and theoretical positions of domestic and foreign countries on whether "secrecy" is an essential component of the crime of theft, and analyzes the reasons for the many controversial legal provisions and legal interpretations. This paper puts forward the idea of "thinking according to the law", that is, keeping the secrecy of the judgment of larceny. The third part demonstrates the viewpoint of this article from the opposite angle and the positive angle respectively. On the one hand, on the one hand, it criticizes from the opposite side to delete the idea of "secrecy": on the legislative level, it does not accord with the principle of legality; on the judicial level, it is not in accordance with the principle of legality. On the other hand, through the response to the viewpoint of scholars who advocate the deletion of the theory, the difference between theft and other acts of invading property is discussed in a positive way. And the reasonable value of the existence of "secrecy" as a necessary component of larceny. This paper supports the "secret" elements of the crime of larceny, which not only accord with the basic principles of criminal law, but also embody the spirit of modesty in our criminal law, and solve the problem that the current criminal law has too simple a regulation on the behavior mode of theft. In practice, the criminal law is difficult to apply due to the variety of criminal behavior.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】