教唆犯未遂的认定

发布时间：2018-02-10 11:42

本文关键词： 教唆犯共犯从属性说教唆犯未遂　出处：《烟台大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：教唆犯未遂的认定问题，一直是国内外刑法理论界争议不休的难题，究其原因主要在于，其一，教唆犯性质的认定一直存在分歧；其二，对我国刑法条文之第29条第2款之规定的理解观点不一。我国刑法关于教唆犯的立法设计也过于简单，致使理论界对此产生诸多争议，尚未达成共识。为了解决上述问题，明析教唆犯未遂认定问题不仅是必要的而且十分迫切。本文针对教唆犯未遂的认定问题，主要分为三大部分：第一部分首先对教唆犯的概念进行界定，进而从共犯独立性说和共犯从属性说两个角度阐述学界关于教唆犯性质的争议，并且在分析共犯独立性说的不科学之处，共犯从属性说更具合理性的基础之上，提出笔者赞成对教唆犯对正犯实行行为的从属性。第二大部分从一则案例着手分析关于教唆犯罪未遂认定存在的争议观点，然后从“着手”、“意志以外的原因”以及“未得逞”三个方面进行研究和分析，考察教唆犯罪的未遂形态认定问题。第三大部分主要探讨的是关于如何进一步完善我国教唆犯未遂的立法规定。为了更好的明析教唆犯未遂的完善方向，笔者在这一部分明确的指出在完善刑事立法之前应当注意的几点问题，然后分析我国关于教唆犯未遂的立法缺陷。最后，提出教唆犯未遂认定需注意的几点问题，并在此基础之上，，结合《刑法》第29条第2款关于教唆犯未遂的规定，提出本文的两点具体完善立法之拙见。
[Abstract]:The identification of attempted abettor has always been a controversial problem in the theoretical circle of criminal law at home and abroad. The main reasons are: first, the nature of abettor has always been different; second, There are different views on the provisions of Article 29, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Law of our country. The legislative design of the Criminal Law on abettor in our country is also too simple, resulting in a lot of controversies in the theoretical circle, and no consensus has been reached. In order to solve the above problems, This paper is mainly divided into three parts: the first part defines the concept of the abettor. Then from the angle of accomplice independence theory and accomplice accessory attribute theory, this paper expounds the controversy about the nature of abettor in academic circles, and on the basis of analyzing the unscientific part of accomplice independence theory, the accomplice attribute theory is more reasonable. The author proposes that the author agrees with the subordinate nature of the act of abettor against the principal offender. The second part analyzes the controversial point of view on the determination of attempted instigator crime from a case. Then from the "start", "the reasons beyond the will" and "failure to succeed" three aspects of research and analysis, The third part is mainly about how to perfect the legislative provisions of the attempted abettor in our country. In order to better analyze the perfect direction of the attempted abettor, the third part mainly discusses how to improve the legislative provisions of the attempted abettor. In this part, the author points out some problems that should be paid attention to before perfecting the criminal legislation, and then analyzes the legislative defects of the attempted abettor in our country. Finally, the author puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to in the identification of the attempted abettor. On this basis, combined with Article 29 (2) of the Criminal Law on the attempted instigator, this paper puts forward two specific views on how to perfect the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】