论中止犯减免刑罚的根据
发布时间:2018-02-10 21:51
本文关键词: 中止犯 减免刑罚根据 刑事政策根据 法律根据 出处:《河南大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】: 中止犯减免刑罚的根据是研究中止犯的首要问题,因为其实际上是中止犯的本质问题。对中止犯减免刑罚根据的理解不同,中止犯的成立要件和适用范围也会有所差异。在大陆法系国家尤其是日本,学者对该问题的研究相当深入。但是,长期以来,我国刑法学界对此问题并没有给以足够的重视,只是最近才不断有学者开始关注。对于我国中止犯减免刑罚的根据,通说的基本结论仍具有合理性,但其观点表述以及论证应当进一步深入或者更具有说服力。本文通过对德国、日本相关学说的评介以及对我国学者的各种观点的评述,在目前的犯罪论体系下,对我国中止犯减免刑罚的根据进行了深入探讨:我国中止犯减免刑罚的根据应当包括刑事政策根据和法律根据两个层面,其中刑事政策根据在于诱导或鼓励行为人在犯罪着手或犯罪既遂之前,及时终结其犯罪进程或主动阻止其犯罪既遂的实现,以救助、保护法益;法律根据在于与同一阶段的预备犯或未遂犯相比,中止犯造成的客观危害较轻、其主观恶性较小。刑事政策根据主要是从宏观上来寻找中止犯减免刑罚的根据之结果,法律根据则主要是从微观上来寻找中止犯减免刑罚的根据之结果,两者之间存在相辅相成、不可或缺的关系。然后,在此基础上,初步阐述了本文主张之根据论对我国中止犯的成立要件和适用范围的具体影响。 全文约46,000字,包括引言、本论和结语等三大部分。其中,引言部分主要是指出该课题的研究现状、本文的选题意义、研究重点以及研究方法。本论部分又分为五个小部分:前三部分通过对德、日相关学说的评介和对我国学者的各种观点的评述,详细地比较了各种观点的优劣得失;第四部分是在前三部分的基础上,对我国中止犯减免刑罚的根据分别从客观面和主观面进行了分析论证,并阐述了两种根据之间的关系,进而得出了结论;最后一部分就本文之根据论对中止犯的成立要件和适用范围的影响进行具体分析。结语部分则是对全文进行总结,并进一步指出对该课题进行理论研究与实证研究的重要性以及本文之缺憾等。
[Abstract]:The basis for the remission of the suspended offence is the most important issue in the study of the suspended offence, because it is in fact the essential issue of the suspended offence. There is a different understanding of the basis for the remission of the penalty for the suspended offence. In civil law countries, especially in Japan, scholars have studied this issue deeply. However, for a long time, the criminal law circles of our country have not paid enough attention to this problem. It is only recently that some scholars have begun to pay close attention to it. The basic conclusion of the general theory is still reasonable for the basis of the remission of punishment for the suspension of offenders in our country. However, the expression and argumentation of its viewpoints should be further or more persuasive. Through the review of the relevant theories of Germany and Japan and the comments on various viewpoints of Chinese scholars, under the present criminal theory system, This paper makes a deep discussion on the basis of remission of punishment for suspension of crime in China: the basis of remission of penalty for suspension of crime in China should include two levels: the basis of criminal policy and the basis of law. The criminal policy is based on inducing or encouraging the perpetrator to terminate the process of crime in time or stop the realization of the accomplished crime in order to save and protect the benefits. The legal basis lies in the fact that the objective harm caused by the suspension of the crime is lighter than that of the preparatory or attempted crime at the same stage, and its subjective malignancy is relatively small. The criminal policy is mainly based on the result of finding the basis for the remission of the penalty for the suspension of the offence from a macro perspective. On the other hand, the legal basis is mainly from the micro level to find the result of the suspension of the remission of punishment, there is a complementary and indispensable relationship between the two. Then, on this basis, This paper preliminarily expounds the concrete influence of the theory of the basis of this article on the conditions of establishment and the scope of application of the suspension of crime in our country. The full text is about 46,000 words, including introduction, theory and conclusion. Among them, the introduction mainly points out the research status of this topic, the significance of this topic, This part is divided into five small parts: the first three parts compare the merits and demerits of various viewpoints of Chinese scholars through the review of German and Japanese related theories and the comments on various viewpoints of Chinese scholars; On the basis of the first three parts, the 4th part analyzes and demonstrates the basis of the remission of punishment in our country from the objective aspect and the subjective aspect, and expounds the relationship between the two kinds of basis, and then draws a conclusion. In the last part, the author makes a concrete analysis of the influence of the theory of the basis of this article on the essential elements and the scope of application of the suspended offense, while the conclusion is a summary of the full text. It also points out the importance of theoretical and empirical research on this subject and the shortcomings of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:河南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 梁晟源;周伟良;;中止犯减免处罚的根据[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2006年06期
2 吴俊;犯罪中止的刑事责任问题[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1998年03期
3 魏东,李运才;中止犯的处罚根据检讨[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2005年03期
4 李立众;;中止犯减免处罚根据及其意义[J];法学研究;2008年04期
5 袁彬,李旭;中止犯处罚若干问题研究[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2004年03期
6 刘雪梅;;中止犯减免处罚根据论[J];求索;2009年07期
7 袁彬;中止犯若干问题比较研究[J];四川警官高等专科学校学报;2004年06期
8 卢建平;;刑事政策与刑法关系的应然追求[J];法学论坛;2007年03期
9 李侠;试论犯罪中止与犯罪未遂的本质区别──兼谈犯罪中止的立法本意[J];中国刑事法杂志;2000年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张平;中止犯论[D];武汉大学;2005年
,本文编号:1501515
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1501515.html