论提供手淫服务不属于刑法意义上的卖淫行为——兼议行政法思维与刑法思维的区别

发布时间：2018-02-20 02:27

本文关键词： 手淫服务卖淫行为行政法思维刑法思维　出处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法实践中在认定发廊手淫服务是否属于刑法意义上的卖淫行为时存在较大争议,导致不同法院对此类案件作出有罪、无罪两种不同判决。学界对此问题同样存在肯定说和否定说两种观点。从同一法律概念在不同部门法的语境中可能存在不同含义,以及以社会危害性作为依据不具备衡量属性并且从刑法解释的一般理性的角度而言,提供手淫服务不应属于刑法意义上的卖淫行为。司法实践中对此存在认识差异的原因主要在于不同主体在认定此问题时分别采用了行政法思维模式与刑法思维模式。而由于两种思维模式在思维特征、适用范围以及逻辑线索等方面存在较大差别,因而如果不加区分地适用就会导致不适当的甚至是错误的结论,在对刑法问题进行思考和认定时应适用刑法思维而非行政法思维。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, there is a great dispute when determining whether the salon masturbation service belongs to prostitution in the sense of criminal law, which leads to different courts guilty of this kind of case. There are two kinds of opinions on this problem: positive and negative. From the same legal concept, there may be different meanings in the context of different branches of law. And from the point of view of the general rationality of the interpretation of criminal law on the basis of social harmfulness, Providing masturbation service should not belong to prostitution in the sense of criminal law. The main reason for the difference in understanding of this problem in judicial practice is that different subjects adopt administrative law thinking mode and criminal law thinking mode respectively in determining this problem. And because of the two modes of thinking in the thinking characteristics, There are great differences in the scope of application and logical clues, so if it is applied indiscriminately, it will lead to inappropriate or even wrong conclusions. The thinking of criminal law rather than administrative law should be applied when thinking and identifying the problems of criminal law.
【作者单位】：湖南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】