渎职犯罪案件中因果关系问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-22 17:27

本文关键词： 渎职犯罪因果关系认定　出处：《南京师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：渎职侵权犯罪是我们国家刑法分则规定惩治国家机关工作人员腐败的一类非常重要的犯罪,其因果关系的正确认定对于解决刑事责任问题具有重要的意义。如何认定渎职行为与所发生的危害结果之间存在引起与被引起的关系,是司法实践中的一大难题。一般犯罪因果关系的认定理论有着诸多学说观点,相对于因果关系的一般性特征,渎职犯罪因果关系的特征又有着自身的特殊性和不同点,同时渎职行为往往隐藏在严重后果背后,不是引起危害结果的直接原因,要在错综复杂的事实中甄别渎职行为与危害结果之间的因果关系,是司法实践中认定渎职罪有争议的难点,正确分析渎职犯罪的因果关系是我们必须面对和解决的课题。本文从分析渎职犯罪因果关系相关基本理论入手,并结合查办的案件对比各种因果关系认定理论,最终在渎职犯罪因果关系认定上选择以条件说为基础,并借鉴英美法系的双层次因果关系说认定。全文共分为四个部分：第一部分是渎职犯罪的因果关系的概述,阐明渎职罪和渎职犯罪因果关系的概念、特征以及种类。第二部分主要是探讨如何认定渎职犯罪的因果关系,首先理清刑法因果关系的一般理论,重点对大陆法系所存在的条件说、原因说、相当因果关系说和英美法系的“双层次因果关系说”,以及我国的必然偶然因果关系理论进行辨析,并对几种主要理论在刑法实务中的应用进行简要评价对比。通过对几种理论对比分析结合实务过程中出现的问题,找出运用“条件说”对渎职犯罪因果关系进行认定的理由,以及运用“双层次因果关系说”的优势,确立以条件说和“双层次因果关系说”以及充分考虑渎职犯罪危害后果的介入因素的认定模式。第三部分介绍了渎职犯罪因果关系的司法实践中认定的理论依据和表现形式;第四部分分析认定渎职犯罪因果关系应注意的问题,通过从渎职犯罪人员、部门、因果联系、造成的危害结果以及渎职行为和危害的逻辑关系的认定五个角度来阐述渎职犯罪因果关系时应该注意的问题。
[Abstract]:The crime of malfeasance and tort is a very important crime of punishing corruption of state officials in the special provisions of our state criminal law. How to determine the relationship between malfeasance and the harmful result is of great significance to solve the problem of criminal responsibility. It is a difficult problem in judicial practice. The theory of identifying causality of general crime has many theoretical viewpoints. Compared with the general characteristics of causality, the characteristic of causality of dereliction of duty crime has its own particularity and difference. At the same time, malfeasance is often hidden behind serious consequences and is not the direct cause of harmful results. The causality between malfeasance and harmful results should be identified in complex facts. It is a difficult point in judicial practice to identify the crime of dereliction of duty. The correct analysis of causality of dereliction of duty is a subject that we must face and solve. This paper begins with the basic theory of causality of dereliction of duty. Combining with the investigation and handling of cases, comparing various theories of causality, and finally choosing the theory of condition as the basis for the determination of causality in dereliction of duty crime, The thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the causality of dereliction of duty, expounding the concept of causality between dereliction of duty and malfeasance. The second part mainly discusses how to identify the causality of dereliction of duty. Firstly, it clarifies the general theory of causality in criminal law, focusing on the condition theory and reason theory of civil law system. The theory of equivalent causality, the theory of "double secondary causality" in Anglo-American law system, and the theory of inevitable accidental causation in our country are analyzed. This paper also briefly evaluates and compares the application of several main theories in the practice of criminal law. Through the comparative analysis of several theories and the problems in the process of practice, the author finds out the reasons for using the "condition theory" to identify the causality of dereliction of duty crime. And the advantage of using the "two-tier causality theory", To establish the identification mode of condition theory and double level causality theory, and to consider the harmful factors of malfeasance crime. The third part introduces the theoretical basis and manifestation of the judicial practice of causality of dereliction of duty crime. Part 4th analyzes the problems that should be paid attention to in determining the causality of dereliction of duty, through the link of causality from the personnel, the department and the cause and effect of malfeasance. The harm result caused and the logical relationship between malfeasance and harm are discussed from five angles: causality of dereliction of duty crime should be paid attention to.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】